Teal Carbon Potential of the Upo Wetland in Korea: Evidence from Diatom and Organic
Carbon Distributions
(Sang Deuk Lee)
1a,†iD
(Min Hwa Gu)
2a*iD
(Mirye Park)
1biD
(Kyung-Hoon Shin)
2biD
(Hoil Lee)
3aiD
(Chae Hong Park)
4aiD
-
(Nakdonggang National Institute of Biological Resources (NNIBR))
-
(Hanyang University ERICA)
-
(Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM))
-
(Encounter the Ecology)
Copyright © KOREAN SOCIETY ON WATER ENVIRONMENT
Key words
Freshwater diatoms, Teal carbon, Total organic carbon (TOC), Upo wetland
1. Introduction
Wetlands play a crucial role in regulating the global carbon cycle by facilitating
the long-term storage of organic carbon in their sediments (Mitsch and Gosselink, 2015). The organic carbon preserved in wetland sediments reflects both aquatic ecosystem
primary productivity and depositional environmental conditions, and the interplay
of these two factors governs the efficiency of carbon burial and preservation (Cohen, 2003). In this context, microalgae such as diatoms serve as major biological agents for
carbon sequestration through photosynthesis and subsequent transfer of organic matter
into sediments (Battin et al., 2008; Round et al., 1990).
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report (IPCC, 2023) states that terrestrial and wetland ecosystems act simultaneously as major sources
and sinks of CO₂ and CH₄ and emphasizes that intact natural wetlands hold substantial
potential for climate mitigation. Furthermore, the 2013 Supplement to the 2006 IPCC
Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Wetlands (IPCC, 2013) identifies sedimentary carbon sequestration in wetlands as an important component
for national greenhouse gas accounting. These global findings strengthen the recognition
of wetlands as active carbon sinks beyond traditional forest-centric perspectives.
In addition, the concept of ‘Teal Carbon’ has recently been proposed to supplement
the established “Blue Carbon” framework by encompassing the carbon-storage functions
of inland freshwater ecosystems- including rivers, lakes, and wetlands-via biological
activity by microalgae, macrophytes, and microorganisms (Nahlik and Fennessy, 2016). This concept underscores the critical role of inland wetlands in the global carbon
cycle.
According to Kumar et al. (2025), Teal Carbon ecosystems exhibit exceptional carbon-storage capacities. Peatlands,
non-tidal freshwater swamps, and marshes store (mean ± SD) approximately 101.63 ±
68.12, 42.82 ± 40.01, and 13.97 ± 10.77 kg C m-2, respectively, corresponding to global stocks of 387.62–442.1, 50.1–62.5, and 14.95–19
Pg C. Combined, these inland wetlands hold approximately 452.67–523.6 Pg C, accounting
for nearly 30% of global soil organic carbon while covering only about 6% of the Earth’s
land surface. In terms of annual carbon sequestration, Teal Carbon ecosystems fix
an estimated 531 Tg C yr-1 (peatlands ≈ 126 ± 110, swamps ≈ 217 ± 256, marshes ≈ 180 ± 171 g C m-2 yr-1), surpassing the sequestration potential of coastal Blue Carbon ecosystems (179–201
Tg C yr-1) and approaching that of Green Carbon terrestrial vegetation (∼1,000 Tg C yr-1). This highlights the disproportionately high climate‐mitigation capacity of inland
wetlands relative to their limited areal extent (Kumar et al., 2025).
Recent research has begun to elucidate the specific contribution of microalgae to
carbon sequestration in inland aquatic ecosystems. Yan et al. (2021) conducted an in situ mesocosm experiment in the Huixian karst wetland of China and
demonstrated that microalgal photosynthesis and the activity of extracellular carbonic
anhydrase (CA) play a significant role in converting dissolved inorganic carbon (mainly
HCO₃⁻) into stable organic carbon. Their results showed that approximately 28.7% of
the bicarbonate supplied by karst groundwater was fixed into organic carbon through
microalgal photosynthesis, with an annual sequestration of 4,207.5 t C yr-1. These findings provide direct quantitative evidence that microalgae―including diatoms―are
major biological drivers of carbon fixation in aquatic environments and likely contribute
substantially to the Teal Carbon stock of freshwater wetlands.
The Upo Wetland, located in the Nakdonggang River basin of southeastern Korea, is
the largest inland natural wetland in the country, supporting diverse ecological functions
and high biodiversity. Previous studies have shown that the Upo Wetland formed through
complex Holocene interactions of sea-level fluctuations, fluvial dynamics, and geomorphological
features such as the bottleneck at the confluence of the Nakdonggang River and Topyeong
Stream (Lee et al., 2020; Lee, Yi et al., 2021; Nahm et al., 2005). These geomorphological conditions induced spatial variability in depositional environments,
which likely affected microalgal community distribution and productivity.
Diatoms are dominant primary producers in freshwater wetlands, contributing significantly
to carbon fixation and sedimentary burial due to their high photosynthetic efficiency
(Smol and Stoermer, 2010). In the East Asian monsoon region, substantial hydrological and nutrient fluctuations
driven by monsoon intensity strongly influence diatom productivity and sedimentary
carbon accumulation (Wanner et al., 2008). Therefore, analyzing spatial variations in diatom abundance and assemblage composition
provides critical insights into carbon sequestration mechanisms within wetland ecosystems.
Lee et al. (2020) reconstructed the Holocene paleoenvironmental history of the Upo Wetland by analyzing
five sediment cores using lithostratigraphic and radiocarbon analyses along with scanning
electron microscopy (SEM) of fossil diatoms. The study revealed a major transition
from fluvial to lacustrine environments since approximately 5,000 years BP and identified
63 diatom taxa, including 14 species newly recorded in Korea. This study established
the first Holocene-scale framework for understanding the ecological evolution of the
Upo Wetland and provided a geological basis for subsequent microalgae-based carbon
storage studies. Building on this, Kwon et al. (2024) analyzed sediment cores collected in 2017 and 2023 and proposed a methodology for
estimating diatom organic carbon content based on geometric cell volume. The study
calculated carbon content per cell ranging from 8.4 to 2,678 pg cell-1 across 80 taxa, presenting the first diatom-based carbon conversion coefficients
for Korean freshwater sediments. Together, these studies demonstrate that diatoms
have functioned both as indicators and mediators of carbon sequestration throughout
the development of the Upo Wetland.
Recent national-scale Blue Carbon assessments in Korea have demonstrated that coastal
tidal flats function as substantial carbon sinks driven largely by fine-grained sediment
deposition and high primary productivity of halophytic vegetation (Lee, Kim et al., 2021). Although this study did not explicitly quantify the role of benthic microalgae,
previous research has highlighted that microphytobenthos―particularly benthic diatoms―contribute
to organic carbon production and sediment stabilization in intertidal flats (Chen et al., 2020; Underwood and Kromkamp, 1999). Building upon and benchmarking these coastal Blue Carbon studies, this study quantitatively
evaluates whether microalgae―particularly diatoms―contribute to carbon accumulation
in inland wetlands by examining the vertical and spatial relationships between sedimentary
Total Organic Carbon (TOC) and diatom abundance in the Upo Wetland.
Despite growing interest in blue and teal carbon ecosystems, quantitative studies
exploring the relationship between microalgal productivity (especially diatoms) and
sedimentary organic carbon storage in freshwater wetlands remain extremely limited.
Elucidating these biogenic carbon sequestration processes is essential for evaluating
the carbon-sink functions of inland wetlands and providing a scientific basis for
climate‐adapted wetland management.
Accordingly, this study aims to quantitatively examine the relationship between TOC
content and diatom abundance in the Upo Wetland sediments to clarify how microalgal
productivity contributes to carbon accumulation. This integrated approach will advance
our understanding of biological carbon sequestration mechanisms in inland wetlands
and support the development of a Teal Carbon assessment framework under future climate-change
scenarios.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1 Sediment Coring and Sampling
The Upo Wetland, located across Yuo-myeon, Ibang-myeon, Daehap-myeon, and Daiji-myeon
in Changnyeong-gun, Gyeongsangnam-do, is the oldest inland wetland in Korea and the
largest natural wetland in the country, covering a total surface area of approximately
2.3 km2 (230 ha) (Kang et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2011). The wetland complex consists of four interconnected sub-basins―Upo, Mokpo, Sajipo,
and Jjokjibeol―of which Upo, the largest basin, represents the main body of the wetland
(Lee et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2011).
The Upo Wetland was designated as a Natural Reserve in 2011 and subsequently designated
as a Wetland Improvement Area in 2012, when the officially protected wetland area
was expanded from 8.54 km2 to 8.547 km2 (Lee et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2011). In March 1998, it became the second site in Korea to be registered under the Ramsar
Convention as a habitat for migratory waterbirds (Lee et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2011).
To compare the characteristics of organic carbon storage and diatom abundance according
to depositional environments at different depths and locations, four sediment cores
were collected from the Upo Wetland at sites UPW02–UPW05 (Table 1). The UPW02 site was in a shallow marginal zone with relatively low water depth, whereas
UPW03, UPW04, and UPW05 were positioned in the central basin of the wetland, representing
deeper depositional environments (Fig. 1).
Table 1. Coordinates, elevations, and the lengths of recovered core for each drilling
site
|
Core
|
Coordinate
|
Elevations (m)
|
Length of recovered core (m)
|
|
UPW02
|
N 35.549064 / E 128.417333
|
10.25
|
9.4
|
|
UPW03
|
N 35.551709 / E 128.412782
|
10.26
|
7.2
|
|
UPW04
|
N 35.552438 / E 128.414296
|
10.28
|
8.4
|
|
UPW05
|
N 35.553168 / E 128.415809
|
10.51
|
7.2
|
Coring was conducted in May 2023 using a double-tube rotary corer equipped with an
NX-size barrel (outer diameter = 75.4 mm; inner core diameter = 54.7 mm), which was
selected to maximize core recovery and minimize disturbance in the soft, water-saturated
sediments of the Upo Wetland. The apparatus consisted of a steel outer barrel and
a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) inner liner to ensure stable recovery of unconsolidated
sediments. The collected sediment cores reached depths of 9.4 m (UPW02), 7.2 m (UPW03),
8.4 m (UPW04), and 7.2 m (UPW05), respectively. Immediately after coring, each core
was vacuum sealed in waterproof plastic bags to prevent desiccation and oxidation
and subsequently transported to the laboratory for further analysis. In the laboratory,
each core was split lengthwise into two halves: one preserved for archival storage
and the other used for analysis. Sedimentological descriptions and subsampling were
performed on the working half of each core following standard procedures (Cohen, 2003; Last and Smol, 2002).
2.2 Diatom Analysis
Subsamples for diatom analysis (∼1 g each) were taken at 10 cm intervals from the
split sediment cores. In the laboratory, approximately 20 g of wet sediment was weighed
using a microbalance (OHAUS Co., USA) and transferred to a 50 mL conical tube. Each
tube was then filled to 50 mL with Ludox-HS 40 solution (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and stirred
thoroughly to disperse sediment particles and expose diatom cells to the solution.
The mixture was centrifuged at 2,000 rpm for 15 min to separate the diatom frustules
from heavier mineral particles. The supernatant containing diatom cells was poured
through a 20 µm sieve to collect the diatom fraction, which was subsequently rinsed
several times with distilled water to remove any remaining Ludox solution. The cleaned
diatom suspension was concentrated to approximately 10 mL with distilled water and
stored in 20 mL amber glass vials prior to mounting.
Fig. 1. Location map of the Upo Wetland and sediment core sampling sites (UPW02–UPW05).
For quantitative microscopic observation, 1 mL of the concentrated diatom suspension
was pipetted into a Sedgwick–Rafter (SR) counting chamber, and all 1,000 grids were
examined. To remove organic matter, additional subsamples were oxidized with 30 mL
of 30% hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) and rinsed five times with distilled water. The cleaned
material was mounted in Pleurax (Mountmedia, Wako, Japan) for observation using a
light microscope (LM) (Eclipse Ni, Nikon, Japan) equipped with Nomarski differential
interference contrast (DIC) optics. Observations were conducted at magnifications
of ×400 and ×1,000, and digital photomicrographs were taken with a DS-Ri2 camera (Ni2,
Nikon, Japan). For ultrastructural examination of fine morphological features not
visible under the LM, hydrogen-peroxide-cleaned samples were filtered onto 2.0 µm
polycarbonate membrane filters (Nuclepore, Whatman, UK), mounted on aluminum stubs,
and sputter-coated with gold–palladium. These were analyzed using a field emission
scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) (MIRA 3, TESCAN, Czech Republic).
2.3 Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Analysis
The collected sediment cores stored frozen until analysis. The frozen cores were split
longitudinally, and sub-samples were obtained from one half of each core, Sub-samples
were transported in a frozen state to the Isotope Ecology and Environmental Science
Laboratory at Hanyang University. Samples were freeze-dried and homogenized using
a mortar and pestle. Approximately 150 mg of the homogenized material was used for
pretreatment prior to TOC analysis. The samples were decalcified with 1N HCl (12 h)
to remove inorganic carbon, rinsed with triple-distilled water, and freeze-dried again.
The dried samples were packed into tin capsules, with 20 - 30 mg of each weighed for
analysis. TOC contents were determined using an elemental analyzer (Vario Select,
Elementar, Germany) combined with a continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometer
(VisION, Elementar, Germany). The IAEA CH-3 standards were analyzed every 12 samples
for calibration and quality control.
2.4 Statistical Analyses of TOC–Diatom Relationship
Statistical analyses were conducted to examine the spatial and vertical variations
in the relationship between TOC content and diatom cell abundance in surface sediments.
The data were first tested for normality and homogeneity of variances using Shapiro–Wilk
and Levene’s tests, respectively.
Spearman’s rank correlation analysis was then used to assess the association between
TOC and diatom cell counts for the entire dataset, as well as within each site and
depth stratum. A two-way ANOVA was performed to evaluate the effects of site and depth,
as well as their interaction, on TOC and diatom cell count. This was followed by a
Tukey’s HSD post hoc comparison to identify specific group differences. When the assumptions
of parametric tests were not satisfied, the nonparametric Scheirer–Ray–Hare test was
applied as an alternative two-factor analysis. To further assess how the TOC– ‘diatom
cell counts’ relationship varied among sites and depths, an analysis of covariance
(ANCOVA) was performed, with TOC as the dependent variable and ‘diatom cell counts’
as a covariate, while site and depth were treated as categorical factors. Additionally,
a linear mixed-effects model was fitted, treating depth as a random factor (TOC∼ ‘diatom
cell counts’ × Site + (1 | Depth)), to account for nested variability among depth
layers. All analyses and graphical visualizations were conducted in R (version 4.5.2)
using the dplyr, ggplot2, car, lme4, broom and companion packages. Pairwise comparisons
of diatom cell count among sampling sites were conducted based on estimated marginal
means using post hoc t-tests.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1 Vertical and Spatial Variations in Sedimentary Characteristics
Four sediment cores (UPW02–UPW05) collected from the Upo Wetland exhibited distinct
vertical and spatial variations in color, grain size, and organic carbon content (Figs. 2, 3). The sediments were mainly composed of fine silt and clay, reflecting the low-energy
depositional environment characteristic of lacustrine basins.
The upper layers of all cores showed higher organic content and finer textures, suggesting
enhanced primary productivity and reduced oxidation during more recent depositional
periods. Such vertical transitions in facies correspond well with previous studies
that interpreted the Upo Wetland as a Holocene lacustrine–palustrine system formed
through interactions among sediment supply, hydrology, and water-level fluctuations
(Lee et al., 2020; Nahm et al., 2005).
Fig. 2. Stratigraphic sections of sediment cores (UPW02–UPW05) from the Upo Wetland.
Each core profile shows vertical variations in lithology and sediment color. Gravel
deposits are predominant at the shallow marginal site (UPW02), whereas relatively
fine-grained sediments are more extensively developed in the central basin cores (UPW03–UPW05).
3.2 Vertical and Spatial Variations and Correlations between TOC and Diatom Abundance
Depth profiles of TOC (%) and diatom cell abundance (cells g-1) were obtained from the four sediment cores (Fig. 3). One core (UPW02) represented the shallow marsh, and three cores (UPW03–UPW05) represented
the deep marsh of the wetland. Both TOC and diatom abundance exhibited pronounced
vertical variations across all sites.
At the shallow marsh (UPW02), the upper sediments exhibited the highest TOC values
(up to 5%) and diatom densities (up to 3 × 107 cells g-1) gradually decreased with depth (Fig. 3A). In contrast, the deep marsh cores (UPW03–UPW05) exhibited generally lower TOC (<
2.5%) and reduced diatom abundance (Fig. 3B–D). The vertical patterns were more uniform or patchy in these deeper cores, reflecting
differences in hydrodynamic stability and productivity. Horizons with elevated diatom
cell abundance often coincide with peaks in TOC, indicating a close association between
diatom productivity and sedimentary organic carbon accumulation.
Fig. 3. Vertical profiles of total organic carbon (TOC, black line) and diatom cell
count (green area) at four sampling sites (A: UPW02, B: UPW03, C: UPW04, D: UPW05).
All variables are plotted against sediment depth (m).
Scatter plots revealed spatial variability in TOC – ‘diatom cell counts’ relationship
(Fig. 4). A strong positive correlation was identified in the shallow marsh (UPW02; R2 = 0.54), while weaker relationships were observed in the central basins―UPW03 (R2 = 0.59), UPW04 (R2 = 0.43), and UPW05 (R2 = 0.05). These patterns suggest that the strength of coupling between TOC and diatom
abundance depends on local depositional and ecological conditions. The highest values
and strongest covariation occurred at the shallow site, implying more active biogenic
carbon input associated with enhanced diatom growth.
Fig. 4. Relationship between TOC and diatom cell count across the four sampling sites
(A: UPW02, B: UPW03, C: UPW04, D: UPW05). Solid blue lines indicate the linear regression
fits with the 95% confidence intervals (gray dashed lines). The regression equations
and coefficients of determination (R2) are shown for each site.
The correlation between TOC and diatom abundance at each site suggests that diatom
productivity plays a significant role in organic carbon accumulation in the Upo wetland
sediments. This is particularly evident in the marked covariation between TOC and
diatom cell density in the shallow marsh (UPW02; R2 = 0.54) (Fig. 4.). This close correlation suggests that microalgal blooms may periodically stimulate
the inflow of biogenic carbon into the sediment reservoir. This interpretation is
consistent with previous studies highlighting the importance of microalgae in carbon
fixation and sequestration through photosynthesis (Bhola et al., 2014; Ighalo et al., 2022).
The differences in TOC content, diatom abundance, and their correlations between shallow
and deep marshes reflect water column depth effects (Table 2, 3., Table S1, S2). The longer sediment remains suspended in the water column, the more it undergoes
biodegradation, uptake, and various chemical and biological tansformations (Arndt et al., 2013; Ramondenc et al., 2024). Consequently, sediments that sink more quickly are more likely to be deposited rapidly.
Therefore, the difference in TOC content between shallow marshes and deep marshes
is attributed to shallower water depths. These results suggest the need to consider
water depth when utilizing wetlands for teal carbon.
TOC content and diatom cell counts generally decline with sediment depth, indicative
of temporal and environmental changes in organic matter accumulation and decomposition
(Fig. 3). The surface layer (0-5 cm) is supplied by phytoplankton deposited from the water
column. Consequently, TOC is high and diatom frustules are well preserved. However,
as the sediment depth increases, the sediment ages and organic matter loss due to
microbial decomposition accumulates, resulting in a decrease in organic matter concentration
and diatom counts (Bao et al., 2021; Bhattacharya et al., 2021). This decreased is maintained by microbial residues of heterotrophic bacteria and
archaea or refractory organic matter from terrestrial or humus sources (Cai et al., 2019; Oni et al., 2015). Ultimately, the simultaneous decrease in TOC and diatom cell counts with depth reflects
a continuous sedimentation-decomposition process: high surface productivity and fresh
organic matter supply → loss of organic carbon through burial and decomposition →
preservation of refractory organic matter at stable depths (Cai et al., 2019; Mackay et al., 2012; Oni et al., 2015; Stief et al., 2013; Veuger and van Oevele, 2011).
Table 2. Statistical summary for TOC and diatom cell counts among sites and depths
|
Variable
|
Factor(s) / Comparison
|
Test statistic
|
df
|
p-value
|
|
Spearman correlation
|
TOC vs CELL
|
All samples
|
ρ = 0.46
|
–
|
0.001
|
|
|
|
By Site
|
ρ = 0.38–0.52
|
–
|
<0.05
|
|
|
|
By Depth
|
ρ = 0.40–0.49
|
–
|
<0.05
|
|
Shapiro–Wilk
|
TOC
|
–
|
W = 0.92
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
CELL
|
–
|
W = 0.89
|
|
0.02
|
|
Levene’s test
|
TOC
|
Site × Depth
|
F = 1.22
|
(3, 120)
|
0.31
|
|
|
CELL
|
Site × Depth
|
F = 1.15
|
(3, 120)
|
0.33
|
|
Two-way ANOVA
|
TOC
|
Site
|
F = 3.21
|
(3,120)
|
0.028
|
|
|
TOC
|
Depth
|
F = 4.85
|
(2,120)
|
0.011
|
|
Scheirer–Ray–Hare
|
CELL
|
Site
|
H = 8.13
|
3
|
0.043
|
|
|
CELL
|
Depth
|
H = 12.55
|
2
|
0.002
|
|
ANCOVA
|
TOC∼CELL × Site × Depth
|
–
|
F = 7.33
|
(1,118)
|
0.008
|
|
LMM
|
TOC∼CELL + Site + (1|Depth)
|
–
|
t = 3.44
|
|
0.001
|
3.3 Statistical Evaluation and Implications for Carbon Sequestration
Nonparametric analyses confirmed significant relationships between TOC and diatom
abundance (Spearman ρ = 0.46, p = 0.001). Site-specific correlations ranged from ρ
= 0.38–0.52 (p < 0.05), and depth-stratified analyses showed similar trends (ρ = 0.40–0.49).
The Shapiro–Wilk tests indicated non-normal data distributions, whereas Levene’s test
showed no significant heterogeneity of variance among sites and depths (p > 0.3).
Two-way ANOVA results demonstrated that both site (F = 3.21, p = 0.028) and depth
(F = 4.85, p = 0.011) significantly affected TOC, while Scheirer–Ray–Hare tests revealed
significant site (H = 8.13, p = 0.043) and depth (H = 12.55, p = 0.002) effects for
diatom abundance. ANCOVA further confirmed an interaction between site and depth on
the TOC–diatom relationship (F = 7.33, p = 0.008), consistent with the linear mixed-effects
model (LMM) results (t = 3.44, p = 0.001).
Pairwise comparisons (Table 3) showed that diatom cell abundance at the shallow marsh (UPW02) was significantly
higher than that at the deep marsh sites UPW03 (t = 3.62, p < 0.01) and UPW05 (t =
3.77, p < 0.01), with a marginal difference from UPW04 (t = 1.77, p ≈ 0.05). No significant
differences were detected among the three deep marsh sites (p > 0.5), indicating generally
homogeneous depositional conditions within the central basin.
Table 3. Pairwise comparisons of diatom cell count among sites
|
Contrast
|
df
|
t-ratio
|
p-value
|
|
UPW02 - UPW03
|
78
|
3.616
|
< 0.01
|
|
UPW02 - UPW04
|
78
|
1.771
|
≒ 0.05
|
|
UPW02 - UPW05
|
78
|
3.766
|
< 0.01
|
|
UPW03 - UPW04
|
78
|
-1.055
|
> 0.5
|
|
UPW03 - UPW05
|
78
|
0.187
|
> 0.5
|
|
UPW04 - UPW05
|
78
|
1.195
|
> 0.5
|
The spatial contrast between the shallow and deep zones highlights the influence of
geomorphology and hydrology on carbon accumulation within the wetland. Higher TOC
and diatom densities in UPW02 likely reflect stronger nutrient influx, greater light
availability, and periodic resuspension, all of which enhance microalgal productivity
and promote the burial of biogenic organic matter. Conversely, lower values in the
central basins correspond to reduced primary productivity and more stable, mineral-dominated
sedimentation.
These findings support the role of microalgae―particularly diatoms―as key biological
agents of Teal Carbon sequestration in inland wetlands. Similar biogenic processes
have been reported from coastal Blue Carbon ecosystems. In Korean tidal flats and
Chinese intertidal zones, microphytobenthos―including benthic diatoms―enhance organic
carbon accumulation through high primary productivity and sediment-binding capacity
(Chen et al., 2020; Lee, Kim et al., 2021). In the present study, the significant co-variation between sedimentary TOC and diatom
abundance across different depths and sites in the Upo Wetland suggests that microalgal
productivity may likewise contribute to carbon accumulation in freshwater inland wetlands.
These findings provide ecological parallels between coastal Blue Carbon systems and
inland Teal Carbon environments, highlighting a common microalgae-associated pathway
for sedimentary carbon storage. The tight coupling between diatom abundance and TOC
supports previous evidence that diatom-derived organic matter constitutes a significant
portion of sedimentary carbon pools in low-energy freshwater environments (Cohen, 2003; Round et al., 1990). Moreover, the spatial heterogeneity observed within the Upo Wetland underscores
the importance of integrating geomorphological and hydrological variability into carbon
budget assessments. This study provides a foundational dataset for improving national-scale
greenhouse gas inventory frameworks and developing Teal Carbon assessment methodologies
applicable to Korean freshwater ecosystems (IPCC, 2013).
Furthermore, Teal Carbon―representing carbon stored in freshwater inland wetlands―constitutes
a globally significant carbon sink, storing approximately 30% of global soil organic
carbon despite wetlands comprising only about 6% of the land area (Kumar et al., 2025; Nahlik et al., 2016; Kumar). This highlights the critical importance of conserving and restoring such
wetlands as part of national and international climate mitigation strategies (Zhang et al., 2025). The current dataset from Upo Wetland contributes valuable baseline information toward
establishing comprehensive greenhouse gas inventories and carbon offset frameworks
specific to Korean inland wetland ecosystems.
As primary producers, diatom plays a vital role in carbon fixation, being responsible
for approximately 20% of global atmospheric CO2 assimilation. Their unique biological mechanisms—including specialized proteinaceous
shells (PyShell) and the ability to concentrate CO₂ to high levels—help Rubisco, the
carbon-fixing enzyme in diatoms, function more effectively (Catherall et al., 2025; Shimakawa et al., 2024). As a result, diatoms synthesize more organic matter (carbon), and the increase in
TOC in sediments as a byproduct of photosynthesis is closely related to the abundance
of diatoms.
When normalized to the wetland area, the estimated carbon accumulation in Upo sediments
aligns with the lower end of global Teal Carbon sequestration rates (126–217 g C m⁻2 yr⁻1; Kumar et al., 2025). Although small in areal extent, the Upo Wetland thus represents a micro‐scale analogue
of inland freshwater systems that collectively store about 452–524 Pg C worldwide.
This highlights the significant but often overlooked contribution of small inland
wetlands to regional carbon budgets and to Korea’s emerging Teal Carbon framework.
Lastly, the observed spatial variability, driven by geomorphological gradients and
hydrological dynamics, emphasizes that wetland carbon storage is not uniform but is
influenced by site-specific sedimentation regimes. Accounting for these factors is
essential to model carbon budgets accurately and to develop effective management plans
aimed at maximizing carbon sequestration in freshwater wetlands.
4. Conclusion
This study quantitatively examined the relationship TOC content and diatom abundance
in sediment cores collected from the Upo Wetland, the largest inland natural wetland
in Korea. The results revealed clear vertical and spatial variations in both TOC and
diatom cell abundance, with the shallow marginal site (UPW02) showing markedly higher
values compared to the central basin sites (UPW03–UPW05). These variations reflect
the influence of hydrological and geomorphological settings on primary productivity
and organic matter deposition within the wetland.
The strong positive correlation between TOC and diatom abundance indicates that diatom
productivity has played a key role in the accumulation of sedimentary organic carbon.
The significant effects of both site and depth, as revealed by statistical analyses,
suggest that carbon sequestration processes in the Upo Wetland are spatially heterogeneous
and governed by interactions among light availability, nutrient input, and water-column
stability.
Furthermore, by benchmarking national Blue Carbon studies on Korean tidal flats, this
study demonstrates that patterns observed in coastal systems―where microphytobenthos
enhance organic carbon accumulation―provide a useful comparative framework for interpreting
carbon dynamics in inland freshwater wetlands. In the Upo Wetland, the consistent
co-variation between sedimentary TOC and diatom abundance across depths and sites
suggests that microalgal productivity may contribute to sedimentary carbon accumulation.
These findings indicate that future Teal Carbon assessments in Korea should incorporate
not only geomorphological and hydrological factors but also microalgal community structure
and productivity to improve the accuracy of carbon inventory approaches.
Collectively, these findings highlight the importance of diatoms as major biological
contributors to Teal Carbon sequestration in freshwater wetlands. Integrating microalgal
productivity data into carbon storage assessments provides a new framework for quantifying
the biogenic component of inland wetland carbon sinks. Furthermore, the results from
this study offer a scientific basis for improving national greenhouse gas inventory
methodologies and for developing region-specific Teal Carbon coefficients applicable
to Korean freshwater ecosystems. Future research should build upon the current study’s
spatial limitations by quantifying the total amount of carbon stored in subaqueous
sediments across the entire Upo Wetland and extending such assessments to representative
freshwater systems throughout Korea. These expanded datasets will allow for estimating
the national-scale carbon storage capacity of freshwater sedimentary environments
and for benchmarking Korea’s Teal Carbon stocks against global estimates. Such efforts
are expected to provide essential evidence for incorporating inland-wetland carbon
sinks into the national greenhouse gas inventory and, ultimately, for informing future
updates to IPCC guideline frameworks.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the project ‘Identification of Carbon Sequestration
and Storage Functions in Freshwater Sedimentary Environments by Microalgae: A Case
Study of the Upo Wetlands’ funded by the Nakdonggang National Institute of Biological
Resources (NNIBR), Ministry of Climate, Energy and Environment (MCEE), Republic of
Korea (Project No. NNIBR20252104).
Appendices
Supplementary Materials
Table S1. Depth-specific diatom cell counts (cells g-1) for each core
|
UPW02
|
UPW03
|
UPW04
|
UPW05
|
|
Depth (m)
|
Diatom cell counts (cells g-1)
|
Depth (m)
|
Diatom cell counts (cells g-1)
|
Depth (m)
|
Diatom cell counts (cells g-1)
|
Depth (m)
|
Diatom cell counts (cells g-1)
|
|
0
|
26,005,970
|
0
|
2,170,385
|
0
|
3,329,333
|
0.1
|
153,488
|
|
0.1
|
21,511,111
|
0.1
|
573,443
|
0.1
|
1,687,304
|
0.2
|
264,000
|
|
0.2
|
16,013,115
|
0.2
|
188,571
|
0.2
|
857,320
|
0.3
|
338,761
|
|
0.3
|
13,750,000
|
0.3
|
156,610
|
0.3
|
93,333
|
0.4
|
333,084
|
|
0.5
|
9,456,716
|
0.4
|
332,973
|
0.4
|
448,302
|
0.5
|
287,525
|
|
0.6
|
6,092,308
|
0.5
|
252,522
|
0.5
|
510,968
|
0.6
|
146,667
|
|
0.7
|
9,428,571
|
0.6
|
255,484
|
0.6
|
347,368
|
0.7
|
44,000
|
|
0.8
|
9,317,647
|
0.7
|
185,047
|
0.7
|
272,609
|
0.8
|
209,109
|
|
0.9
|
5,221,978
|
0.8
|
70,534
|
0.8
|
181,651
|
0.9
|
182,553
|
|
1
|
18,061
|
0.9
|
92,308
|
0.9
|
281,942
|
1
|
121,224
|
|
1.1
|
9,667
|
1
|
97,778
|
1
|
28,085
|
1.1
|
2,922,857
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
215,217
|
1.1
|
167,797
|
1.2
|
14,667
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
10,313
|
1.2
|
614,656
|
1.3
|
214,884
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
17,959
|
1.3
|
94,286
|
1.4
|
249,730
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
4,490
|
1.4
|
133,784
|
1.5
|
256,991
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
11,282
|
1.5
|
28,696
|
1.6
|
199,245
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
24,000
|
1.6
|
28,085
|
1.7
|
296,075
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
5,946
|
1.7
|
10,154
|
1.8
|
124,865
|
|
|
|
2
|
426
|
1.8
|
36,667
|
1.9
|
288,750
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
11,892
|
1.9
|
1,056,000
|
2
|
66,667
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
659
|
2.4
|
980,198
|
2.4
|
166,486
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
11,892
|
2.5
|
205,049
|
2.5
|
88,989
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
504
|
2.6
|
330,000
|
2.6
|
870
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
13,333
|
3.2
|
291,789
|
3.2
|
2,098
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
349
|
3.3
|
175,102
|
3.3
|
1,165
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
6,408
|
3.4
|
75,429
|
3.4
|
165,000
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
714
|
3.5
|
211,200
|
3.5
|
1,304
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
48,889
|
3.6
|
14,348
|
3.6
|
20,787
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
29,011
|
3.7
|
44,370
|
3.8
|
1,510,843
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
682
|
3.8
|
115,340
|
3.9
|
117,857
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
667
|
4
|
382,800
|
4
|
28,905
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
513
|
4.1
|
221,947
|
5.3
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
10,476
|
4.2
|
322,979
|
5.5
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
465
|
4.3
|
789,744
|
5.6
|
145,055
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
18,679
|
4.4
|
595,082
|
5.7
|
659
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
70,213
|
4.5
|
476,975
|
5.8
|
632
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
11,478
|
4.6
|
1,278,750
|
5.9
|
429
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
29,663
|
4.8
|
1,125,474
|
6
|
550
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
14,505
|
4.9
|
623,736
|
5.5
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
10,820
|
5
|
394,483
|
5.6
|
145,055
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
465
|
5.1
|
181,176
|
5.7
|
659
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
49,346
|
5.8
|
632
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
13,750
|
5.9
|
429
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
4,400
|
6
|
550
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
8,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
8,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
571
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
469
|
|
|
Table S2. Depth-specific total organic carbon TOC (%) values for each core
|
UPW02
|
UPW03
|
UPW04
|
UPW05
|
UPW02
|
UPW03
|
UPW04
|
UPW05
|
|
Depth (m)
|
C%
|
Depth (m)
|
C%
|
Depth (m)
|
C%
|
Depth (m)
|
C%
|
Depth (m)
|
C%
|
Depth (m)
|
C%
|
Depth (m)
|
C%
|
Depth (m)
|
C%
|
|
0
|
3.33
|
0
|
2.02
|
0
|
2.53
|
0.1
|
1.11
|
4
|
0.19
|
5.6
|
0.71
|
5
|
1.22
|
5.1
|
0.69
|
|
0.1
|
3.33
|
0.1
|
1.41
|
0.1
|
1.83
|
0.2
|
1.05
|
4.1
|
0.19
|
5.7
|
0.66
|
5.1
|
1.43
|
5.2
|
0.47
|
|
0.2
|
4.21
|
0.2
|
0.97
|
0.2
|
1.25
|
0.3
|
1.1
|
4.2
|
0.31
|
5.8
|
0.63
|
5.2
|
1.25
|
5.3
|
0.53
|
|
0.3
|
3.70
|
0.3
|
0.93
|
0.3
|
0.98
|
0.4
|
1.02
|
4.3
|
0.46
|
5.9
|
0.54
|
5.3
|
0.87
|
5.4
|
0.42
|
|
0.5
|
3.36
|
0.4
|
1.17
|
0.4
|
1.11
|
0.5
|
1.01
|
4.4
|
0.62
|
6
|
0.36
|
5.4
|
1.28
|
5.5
|
0.46
|
|
0.6
|
2.04
|
0.5
|
1.24
|
0.5
|
1.08
|
0.6
|
1.01
|
4.5
|
0.59
|
6.4
|
0.22
|
5.5
|
0.98
|
5.6
|
0.45
|
|
0.7
|
2.76
|
0.6
|
1.23
|
0.7
|
1.1
|
0.7
|
1.01
|
4.6
|
0.47
|
6.5
|
0.24
|
5.6
|
1.27
|
5.7
|
2.05
|
|
0.8
|
2.33
|
0.7
|
0.83
|
0.8
|
1.16
|
0.8
|
1.27
|
4.7
|
0.54
|
6.6
|
0.24
|
5.7
|
0.89
|
5.8
|
1.7
|
|
1
|
1.19
|
0.8
|
0.66
|
0.9
|
1.18
|
0.9
|
0.98
|
4.8
|
0.62
|
6.7
|
0.2
|
5.8
|
0.74
|
5.9
|
1.75
|
|
1.1
|
0.38
|
0.9
|
0.57
|
1
|
1.3
|
1
|
1.26
|
4.9
|
0.58
|
5.9
|
0.9
|
6
|
1.75
|
|
1.2
|
0.95
|
1
|
0.73
|
1.1
|
1.02
|
1.1
|
1.58
|
5
|
0.53
|
6
|
0.97
|
6.1
|
1.29
|
|
1.3
|
0.63
|
1.1
|
0.96
|
1.2
|
0.8
|
1.2
|
0.79
|
5.1
|
0.26
|
6.1
|
0.58
|
6.2
|
1.72
|
|
1.4
|
0.35
|
1.3
|
0.82
|
1.3
|
0.64
|
1.3
|
0.02
|
5.2
|
0.57
|
6.2
|
0.66
|
6.3
|
1.03
|
|
1.5
|
0.74
|
1.4
|
0.95
|
1.4
|
0.59
|
1.4
|
0.76
|
5.3
|
0.46
|
6.4
|
0.62
|
6.4
|
0.95
|
|
1.6
|
0.59
|
1.5
|
0.69
|
1.5
|
0.62
|
1.5
|
0.74
|
5.4
|
0.55
|
6.5
|
0.58
|
6.5
|
0.91
|
|
1.7
|
0.57
|
1.6
|
0.71
|
1.6
|
0.63
|
1.8
|
0.8
|
5.8
|
0.40
|
6.6
|
0.62
|
6.6
|
1.61
|
|
1.8
|
0.27
|
1.7
|
0.68
|
1.7
|
0.91
|
1.9
|
0.75
|
5.9
|
0.55
|
6.7
|
0.54
|
6.7
|
0.8
|
|
1.9
|
0.30
|
1.8
|
0.59
|
1.8
|
0.95
|
2
|
0.91
|
6
|
0.62
|
6.8
|
0.55
|
6.8
|
0.43
|
|
2
|
0.17
|
2
|
1.21
|
1.9
|
0.8
|
2.4
|
0.92
|
6.1
|
1.33
|
6.9
|
0.47
|
7
|
0.2
|
|
2.1
|
0.20
|
2.5
|
0.85
|
2.4
|
0.74
|
2.5
|
0.9
|
6.2
|
0.91
|
7
|
0.95
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
0.25
|
2.6
|
0.55
|
2.5
|
0.66
|
2.6
|
0.83
|
6.3
|
0.55
|
7.1
|
0.96
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
0.24
|
2.7
|
0.38
|
2.6
|
0.65
|
3.2
|
0.75
|
6.4
|
0.76
|
7.2
|
0.73
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
0.28
|
2.8
|
0.42
|
3.2
|
0.94
|
3.3
|
0.81
|
6.6
|
1.43
|
7.3
|
1.15
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
0.21
|
2.9
|
0.56
|
3.3
|
0.88
|
3.4
|
0.69
|
6.7
|
1.62
|
7.4
|
1.13
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
0.31
|
3.2
|
0.72
|
3.4
|
0.88
|
3.5
|
0.84
|
6.8
|
1.18
|
7.5
|
1.38
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
0.34
|
3.3
|
0.58
|
3.7
|
0.8
|
3.6
|
0.91
|
6.9
|
0.96
|
7.6
|
1.26
|
|
|
|
3
|
0.42
|
3.4
|
0.75
|
3.8
|
0.77
|
3.8
|
1.25
|
7
|
1.22
|
7.7
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
0.32
|
4.3
|
1.03
|
4
|
0.79
|
4
|
1.26
|
7.1
|
1.31
|
7.8
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
0.29
|
4.4
|
1.03
|
4.1
|
0.68
|
4.1
|
1.29
|
7.2
|
1.22
|
7.9
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
0.37
|
4.5
|
1.39
|
4.2
|
0.58
|
4.3
|
0.51
|
7.3
|
0.44
|
8
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
0.28
|
4.6
|
0.96
|
4.3
|
0.86
|
4.4
|
0.54
|
7.4
|
0.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
0.29
|
4.7
|
1.06
|
4.4
|
1.16
|
4.5
|
0.84
|
7.5
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
0.29
|
4.8
|
0.97
|
4.5
|
1.16
|
4.6
|
1.14
|
7.6
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
0.26
|
5.2
|
0.92
|
4.6
|
1.23
|
4.8
|
0.96
|
7.7
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
0.20
|
5.3
|
0.74
|
4.8
|
0.91
|
4.9
|
0.73
|
7.8
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
0.31
|
5.5
|
0.64
|
4.9
|
0.87
|
5
|
0.72
|
7.9
|
1.39
|
|
|
|
|
References
Arndt S., Jørgensen B. B., LaRowe D. E., Middelburg J. J., Pancost R. D., Regnier
P., 2013, Quantifying the degradation of organic matter in marine sediments: A review
and synthesis, Earth-science reviews, Vol. 123, pp. 53-86

Bao H., Li Y., Diao X., Wang S., 2021, Effects of algal bloom (AB) on sediment microorganisms
with special functions at different AB stages in Chaohu Lake, Water Science and Technology,
Vol. 83, No. 5, pp. 1130-1140

Battin T. J., Kaplan L. A., Findlay S., Hopkinson C. S., Marti E., Packman A. I.,
Newbold J. D., Sabater F., 2008, Biophysical controls on organic carbon fluxes in
fluvial networks, Nature Geoscience, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 95-100

Bhattacharya S., Mapder T., Fernandes S., Roy C., Sarkar J., Rameez M. J., Mandal
S., Sar A., Chakraborty A. K., Mondal N., Chatterjee S., Dam B., Peketi A., Chakraborty
B., Mazumdar A., Ghosh W., 2021, Sedimentation rate and organic matter dynamics shape
microbiomes across a continental margin, Biogeosciences Discussions, Vol. 18, No.
18, pp. 5203-5222

Bhola V., Swalaha F., Ranjith Kumar R., Singh M., Bux F., 2014, Overview of the potential
of microalgae for CO2 sequestration, International Journal of Environmental Science
and Technology, Vol. 11, No. 7, pp. 2103-2118

Cai R., Zhou W., He C., Tang K., Guo W., Shi Q., Gonsior M., Jiao N., 2019, Microbial
processing of sediment‐derived dissolved organic matter: Implications for its subsequent
biogeochemical cycling in overlying seawater, Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences,
Vol. 124, No. 11, pp. 3479-3490

Catherall E., Musial S., Atkinson N., Walker C. E., Mackinder L. C., McCormick A.
J., 2025, From algae to plants: understanding pyrenoid-based CO2-concentrating mechanisms,
Trends in biochemical sciences, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 33-45

Chen D., Li M., Zhang Y., Zhang L., Tang J., Wu H., 2020, Effects of diatoms on erosion
and accretion processes in saltmarsh inferred from field observations of hydrodynamic
and sedimentary processes, Ecohydrology

Cohen A. S., 2003, Paleolimnology: The History and Evolution of Lake Systems

Ighalo J. O., Dulta K., Kurniawan S. B., Omoarukhe F. O., Ewuzie U., Eshiemogie S.
O., Ojo A. U., Abdullah S. R. S., 2022, Progress in microalgae application for CO2
sequestration, Cleaner Chemical Engineering, Vol. 3, pp. 100044

2013, 2013 Supplement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories,
Wetlands

2023, Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II
and III to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change

Kang M. J., Kim C. S., Oh K. H., 2007, Flora, actual vegetation map, and primary production
of the vascular hydrophytes and hygrophytes in the Upo Wetland, Journal of Wetlands
Research, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 45-55

Kumar S., Sharma L. K., Fennessy M. S., 2025, Global teal carbon: Stocks, sequestration,
and its potential role in climate change mitigation, Science of the Total Environment,
Vol. 995, pp. 180128

Kwon D. R., Park C. H., Cho H. J., Park M., Lee S. D., 2024, Methodology for estimating
organic carbon content from cell volume in freshwater diatoms, Journal of Korean Society
on Water Environment, Vol. 40, No. 6, pp. 305-315

2002, Tracking environmental change using lake sediments: Volume 1: Basin analysis,
coring, and chronological techniques

Lee E., Yi S., Lim J., Cho A., Kim Y., Jo K. N., 2021, Multi-proxy indications of
depositional evolution and paleo-natural disasters (flooding and fire) in the southern
part of the Korean Peninsula during the Holocene, Quaternary Science Reviews, Vol.
263, pp. 107007

Lee H., Lee S. D., Lee J. Y., Lim J., Kwon D., Park M., Yun S. M., 2020, Holocene
paleoenvironmental changes and characteristic of diatom distribution in Upo Wetland
of Korea, Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 109-137

Lee J. C., Koo B. Y., Yoon C. S., Lee D. J., Cheong S. W., 2011, Seasonal Changes
on Community Structures of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Wetland Upo, Journal of the
Environmental Science International, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 261-274

Lee J., Kim B., Noh J., Lee C., Kwon I., Kwon B. O., Ryu J., Park J., Hong S., Lee
S., Kim S. G., Son S., Yoon H. J., Yim J., Nam J., Choi K., Khim J. S., 2021, The
first national scale evaluation of organic carbon stocks and sequestration rates of
coastal sediments along the West Sea, South Sea, and East Sea of South Korea, Science
of the Total Environment, Vol. 793, pp. 148568

Mackay E. B., Jones I. D., Folkard A. M., Barker P., 2012, Contribution of sediment
focussing to heterogeneity of organic carbon and phosphorus burial in small lakes,
Freshwater Biology, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 290-304

Mitsch W. J., Gosselink J. G., 2015, Wetlands

Nahlik A. M., Fennessy M. S., 2016, Carbon storage in US wetlands, Nature Communications,
Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 13835

Nahm W. H., Kim J. K., Yang D. Y., Kim J. Y., Yi S., Yu K. M., 2005, Holocene paleosols
of the Upo wetland, Korea: Their implications for wetland formation, Quaternary International,
Vol. 144, No. 1, pp. 53-60

Oni O. E., Schmidt F., Miyatake T., Kasten S., Witt M., Hinrichs K. U., Friedrich
M. W., 2015, Microbial communities and organic matter composition in surface and subsurface
sediments of the Helgoland mud area, North Sea, Frontiers in Microbiology, Vol. 6,
pp. 1290

Ramondenc S., Iversen M. H., Soltwedel T., 2024, Long-term measurements reveal a 100-day
lag between peaks in phytoplankton chlorophyll and benthic bacterial abundance in
the Fram Strait, ICES Journal of Marine Science, Vol. 81, No. 8, pp. 1647-1654

Round F. E., Crawford R. M., Mann D. G., 1990, The Diatoms: Biology and Morphology
of the Genera

Shimakawa G., Demulder M., Flori S., Kawamoto A., Tsuji Y., Nawaly H., Tanaka A.,
Tohda R., Ota T., Matsui H., Morishima N., Okubo R., Wietrzynski W., Lamm L., Righetto
R. D., Uwizeye C., Gallet B., Jouneau P. -H., Gerle C., Kurisu G., Finazzi G., Engel
B. D., Matsuda Y., 2024, Diatom pyrenoids are encased in a protein shell that enables
efficient CO2 fixation, Cell, Vol. 187, No. 21, pp. 5919-5934

2010, The diatoms: Applications for the environmental and earth sciences

Stief P., Kamp A., de Beer D., 2013, Role of diatoms in the spatial-temporal distribution
of intracellular nitrate in intertidal sediment, PloS one, Vol. 8, No. 9

Underwood G. J., Kromkamp J., 1999, Primary production by phytoplankton and microphytobenthos
in estuaries, Advances in ecological research, Vol. 29, pp. 93-153

Veuger B., van Oevelen D., 2011, Long‐term pigment dynamics and diatom survival in
dark sediment, Limnology and Oceanography, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 1065-1074

Wanner H., Beer J., Bütikofer J., Crowley T. J., Cubasch U., Flückiger J., Goosse
H., Grosjean M., Joos F., Kaplan J. O., Küttel M., Müller S. A., Prentice I. C., Solomina
O., Stocker T. F., Tarasov P., Wagner M., Widmann M., 2008, Mid-to Late Holocene climate
change: An overview, Quaternary Science Reviews, Vol. 27, No. 19-20, pp. 1791-1828

Yan Z., Shen T., Li W., Cheng W., Wang X., Zhu M., Yu Q., Xiao Y., Yu L., 2021, Contribution
of microalgae to carbon sequestration in a natural karst wetland aquatic ecosystem:
An in-situ mesocosm study, Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 768, pp. 144387

Zhang Y., Zhang X., Fang W., Cai Y., Zhang G., Liang J., Chang J., Chen L., Wang H.,
Zhang P., Wang Q., Zhang Y., 2025, Carbon sequestration potential of wetlands and
regulating strategies response to climate changes, Environmental Research, pp. 120890
