(Su-Hyeon Choe)
1
(Yun-Je Park)
1
(Yu-Sung Kim)
2
(Byung-Chul Cha)
2
(Sung-Bo Heo)
3
(Sungook Yoon)
4
(Young-Min Kong)
1
(Daeil Kim)
1*
Copyright © 2020 The Korean Institute of Metals and Materials
Key words(Korean)
TIO, magnetron sputtering, AFM, XRD, figure of merit
1. INTRODUCTION
Various indium oxide (In2O3) films doped with metals such as molybdenum (Mo) [1, 2] titanium (Ti) [3], zirconium (Zr) [4], tungsten (W) [5], and niobium (Nb) [6] exhibit high visible transmittance (≥ 80%) and low resistivity (≤1×10-3cm), and have been applied in various optoelectrical devices including transparent
thin film transistors (TTFT) and liquid crystal displays (LCD) [7, 8].
Among all the metal doped In2O3 films, Ti-doped In2O3 (TIO) and Mo-doped In2O3 (MIO) films have received attention because they exhibit high conductivity with rapid
carrier mobility [9]. In a previous study, Y. Meng [10] reported a resistivity of 1.6 × 10-4 Ω cm for 4 at. % Mo-doped In2O3 films and asserted that the high conductivity was due to the substitution of In3+ by Mo6+. In addition, T. Koida reported the enhanced near-infrared transparence of Zr doped
In2O3 (ZIO) films, which had a resistivity of 2.6 × 10-4 Ω cm. The firms were deposited by the RF magnetron co-sputtering of In2O3 and In1.9Zr0.1O3 targets, for thin film solar cells [4]. Also, R. K. Gupta prepared TIO films on sapphire substrate using KrF excimer laser
deposition to examine the influence of substrate temperature on the opto-electrical
properties of the films. They suggested the optimal temperature of 600 °C, which assured
higher carrier mobility than the other temperature conditions [11]. However, such high temperature is not recommended because it may restrict the type
of flexible polymer substrate that can be used for bendable optoelectrical devices.
In this study, TIO films were deposited by the radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering
of a Ti doped In2O3 target, and were then electron beam-irradiated to enhance the opto-electrical properties
of the films. Electron beam irradiation with an optimal incident energy assures both
low temperature grain growth and flat surface morphology, which will increase visible
transmittance [12-14].
2. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
In this study, an RF (13.56 MHz) magnetron sputter with an electron irradiation system
[12] was used to deposit the TIO thin films (thickness; 100 nm) on a slide glass substrate
(size; 30 × 30 mm2, Corning 2948) at room temperature. The chamber was evaluated to 5.5 × 10−7 Torr and then inert argon (Ar) was injected (10 sccm) to maintain a deposition pressure
of 1.0 × 10−3 Torr. The TIO target was biased with RF 2.5W/cm2 for all depositions.
After deposition, we biased the RF power of 200W on an inductively coupled plasma
(ICP) antenna in an electron beam source and varied the electron irradiation energy
from 300 to 1500 eV in a low vacuum of 1 × 10-5 Torr (Ar atmosphere). The variation in grain sizes related to optical transmittance
and electrical resistivity was evaluated using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, XPert-APD,
Philips) at the Korea Basic Science Institute (KBSI), Daegu Center. The visible transmittance,
sheet resistance, electrical properties, and chemical composition were observed by
UV-visible spectrophotometry (Avaspec-2048L, Avantes), four point probe (Loresta-EP,
Mitsubishi Chemical), Hall measurement system (HMS-3000, Ecopia) and energy dispersive
spectrometer (EDS, JSM-6500F, JEOL), respectively. The bare glass had an optical transmittance
of 92% in the visible wavelength region. In addition, the influence of electron irradiation
on the surface roughness was investigated using an atomic force microscope (AFM, scan
area; 3 × 3 μm2, XE-100, Park Systems).
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In a previous study, Hest et al. deposited TIO films onto a glass substrate with a
combinatorial sputtering system and investigated the relation between Ti doping rate
(0-7 at. %) and carrier mobility [15]. It was demonstrated that films doped with 2.8 at. % of Ti showed excellent opto-electrical
properties. Thus, we deposited TIO films by RF magnetron sputtering with 3.0 at. %
Ti doped In2O3 target. Fig 1 and Table 1 show the observed chemical composition of the films.
Fig 2 shows the XRD patterns observed from the TIO films as a function of electron irradiation
energy from 300 to 1500 eV. All of the XRD plots exhibited some diffraction peaks
of the cubic bixbyite In2O3 (222), (400), (440), and (622) planes regardless of the electron irradiation energy,
while the characteristic diffraction peak for crystalline TiO2 did not appear, even at electron irradiation of 1500 eV. Table 2 shows the observed grain size of the In2O3 (222) plane using the Scherrer equation [16]. The average grain size with electron irradiation at 300, 600, 900, 1200, and 1500
eV were evaluated to be in the order of 9.1, 10.6, 12.5, 14.3 and 15.6 nm. It was
concluded that the post-deposition electron irradiation was effective for enhancing
the thin film crystallization.
Fig 3 shows a surface image of the TIO films electron irradiated at different energies,
with root mean square (RMS) roughness. The RMS roughness of the as deposited films
was found to be 0.63 nm. As electron irradiation energy increased up to 1500 eV, the
RMS roughness decreased down to 0.36 nm.
Fig 4 shows the visible transmittance of the as deposited films, and after electron beam
irradiation at different energies. The bare glass substrate had an optical transmittance
of 93% in the visible wavelength region, while the as deposited film has a lower average
visible transmittance of 77.1%. The visible transmittance was enhanced when the electron
irradiation energy increased. The average visible transmittance of the films electron-irradiated
at 1500 eV was 83.2%. From XRD and AFM observations, it was found that the increased
visible transmittance of the TIO films could be attributed to a flatter surface and
larger grain size, induced by the postdeposition electron irradiation.
Table 3 shows the dependence of electrical resistivity, carrier density, and mobility on
electron irradiation energy. The TIO films electron irradiated at 1500 eV show a higher
carrier density of 3.22 × 1020 cm-3. Both carrier density and carrier mobility were enhanced by increases in the electron
incident energy. The highest mobility of 30.1 cm2/Vs was observed for TIO films electron irradiated at 1500 eV. The decrease in resistivity
(6.4 × 10-4 Ωcm) with increasing electron irradiation energy was attributed to the enlargement
in grain size, as shown in Table 1.
Table 4 shows the compared electrical properties of some impurity doped In2O3 thin films. The Ti doped films showed relatively low resistivity from 5.2 × 10-4 Ωcm to 7.3 × 10-4 Ωcm, depending on the deposition method and substrate temperature conditions. In
Table 3, even though some Ti and Zr doped films showed lower resistivity than the TIO films
prepared in this study, those films were deposited at a relatively high substrate
temperature, of 500 °C for the Ti doped films [17] and 650 °C for the Zr doped films [4].
Fig 5 shows a plot of (αhν)2 of the TIO films as a function of the photon energy. The absorption coefficient (α)
is evaluated from Eq. (1) [18]:
where t is the thickness and T is the visible transmittance. The Tauc formula in Eq. (2) shows the relationship between the optical absorption coefficient (α) and the optical
band gap (Eg) [19]:
where hν is the photon energy and A is the absorption edge width parameter. In Fig 5, the optical band gap increased from 4.013 (at deposition) to 4.108 eV as the electron
energy was increased to 1500 eV.
Table 5 shows the carrier density and optical band gap of the TIO films as a function of
the electron irradiation energy. From the observed electrical properties and optical
band gap, it is concluded that the optical band gap shift is related to the carrier
density of the films [20,21]. The band gap was enhanced from 4.013 to 4.108 eV, while the carrier density increased
from 9.8 × 1019 (at deposition) to 3.22 × 1020 cm-3 (at 1500 eV).
4. CONCLUSIONS
Conductive and transparent TIO films were prepared on glass slide substrates using
RF magnetron sputtering and then electron beam irradiation, to study the influence
of incident electron energy on the visible transmittance, optical band gap, and electrical
resistivity of the films. XRD patterns and AFM images showed that the crystallite
size increased with electron irradiation energy, and the electron irradiated films
at 1500 eV showed the lowest RMS roughness of 0.36 nm. The decrease in resistivity
(6.4 × 10-4 Ωcm) with increasing electron irradiation energy was attributed to the enhanced crystallinity
and surface flatness of the films. The results demonstrated that electron beam irradiation
effectively improved the optical and electrical performances of the TIO thin films.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the 2020 Research Fund of University of Ulsan.
REFERENCES
Seo D. J., Park S. H., Physica. B,357, 420 (2005)

Hashimoto R., Abe Y., Nakada T., Appl. Phys. Express,1, 015002 (2008)

Koida T., Kondo M., Appl. Phys. lett,89, 082104 (2006)

Koida T., Kondo M., J. Appl. Phys,101, 063705 (2007)

Acosta D. R., Martínez A. I., Thin Solid Films,515, 8432 (2007)

Gupta R. K., Ghosh K., Patel R., Mishra S. R., Kahol P. K., Mater. Chem. Phys,112,
136 (2008)

Koo S. B., Lee C. M., Kwon S. J., Jeon J. M., Hur J. Y., Lee H. K., Met. Mater. Int,25,
117 (2019)

Kim H. S., Kim S. J., Korean J. Met. Mater,57, 84 (2019)

Kim D., Kim B., Kim H., Thin Solid Films,547, 225 (2013)

Meng Y., Yang X., Chen H., Shen J., Jiang Y., Zhang Z., Hua Z., J. Vac. Sci. Technol.
A,20, 288 (2002)

Gupta R. K., Ghosh K., Mishra S. R., Kahol P.K., Mater. Lett,62, 1033 (2008)

Kim Y. S., Choi J. Y., park Y. J., Choe S. H., Cha B. C., Kong Y. M., Kim D., Korean
J. Met. Mater,58, 190 (2020)

Hong C. H., Jo Y. J., Kim H. A., Lee I. H., Kwak J. S., Thin Solid Films,519, 6829
(2011)

Li Y., Han L., Kong X., Mater. Sci. Eng,677, 022066 (2019)

van Hest M. F. A. M., Dabney M. S., Perkins J. D., Ginley D. S., Appl. Phys. Lett,87,
032111 (2005)

Gong T. K., Heo S. B., Kim D., Ceram. Inter,42, 12341 (2016)

Groth R., Phys. Status Solidi,14, 69 (1966)

Peng S., Yao T., Yang Y., Zhang K., Jiang J., Jin K., Li G., Cao X., Xu G., Wang Y.,
Physica B,503, 111 (2016)

Tauc J., Mater. Res. Bull,3, 37 (1968)

Jo W. H., Choi D., Korean J. Met. Mater,57, 91 (2019)

Jeong E., Lee G.-H., Cho Y.-R., Yun J., Korean J. Met. Mater,57, 316 (2019)

Figures and Tables
Fig. 1.
The chemical composition of as deposited TIO film.
Fig. 2.
The XRD pattern of the TIO films electron irradiated at different energy. (a) As deposition,
(b) 300 eV, (c) 600 eV, (d) 900 eV, (e) 1200 eV, (f) 1500 eV.
Fig. 3.
Surface image and RMS roughness of the films electron irradiated at different energy.
(a) As deposition, 0.65 nm, (b) 300 eV, 0.61 nm, (c) 600 eV, 0.51 nm, (d) 900 eV,
0.43 nm, (e) 1200 eV, 0.39 nm. (f) 1500 eV, 0.36 nm.
Fig. 4.
The visible transmittance of the films electron irradiated at different energy. (a)
As deposition 77.1%, (b) 300 eV 78.3%, (c) 600 eV 78.5%, (d) 900 eV 80.1%, (e) 1200
eV 80.5%, (f) 1500 eV 83.2%.
Fig. 5.
Plots of (αhν)2 as a function of the photon energy(hν) for TIO thin films electron irradiated at
different energy. (a) As deposition, (b) 300 eV, (c) 600 eV, (d) 900 eV, (e) 1200
eV, (f) 1500 eV.
Table 1.
The chemical composition of the target and film.
|
Element
|
Line
|
Target (at %)
|
Film (at %)
|
|
O
|
K
|
67.86
|
65.73
|
|
Ti
|
K
|
3.09
|
3.52
|
|
In
|
L
|
29.05
|
30.75
|
Table 2.
Grain size of In2O3 (222) plane in TIO films as a function of electron irradiated
energy. (FWHM ; full width at half maximum)
|
Electron energy (eV)
|
2 Theta (Deg.)
|
FWHM (Deg.)
|
Grain Size (nm)
|
|
As deposition
|
30.40
|
1.0229
|
8.4
|
|
300
|
30.39
|
0.9019
|
9.1
|
|
600
|
30.38
|
0.7762
|
10.6
|
|
900
|
30.40
|
0.6601
|
12.5
|
|
1200
|
30.45
|
0.5772
|
14.3
|
|
1500
|
30.46
|
0.5279
|
15.6
|
Table 3.
The electrical properties of TIO films as a function of electron irradiation energy.
|
Electron energy (eV)
|
Carrier Density (cm-3)
|
Mobility (cm2/vs)
|
Resistivity (Ωcm)
|
|
As deposition
|
9.82 × 1019 |
21.5
|
2.9 × 10-3 |
|
300
|
1.06 × 1020 |
22.6
|
2.2 × 10-3 |
|
600
|
1.24 × 1020 |
24.7
|
2.0 × 10-3 |
|
900
|
2.63 × 1020 |
25.7
|
9.2 × 10-4 |
|
1200
|
3.05 × 1020 |
27.1
|
7.5 × 10-4 |
|
1500
|
3.22 × 1020 |
30.1
|
6.4 × 10-4 |
Table 4.
The electrical properties of impurity doped In2O3 thin films.
|
Dopant
|
Carrier density (cm-3)
|
Mobility (cm2/vs)
|
Resistivity (Ωcm)
|
Reference
|
|
Mo
|
4.9 × 1020 |
17.2
|
7.3 × 10-4 |
2
|
|
W
|
2.4 × 1020 |
26.0
|
1.0 × 10-3 |
5
|
|
Zr
|
1.0 × 1020 |
110
|
5.7 × 10-4 |
4
|
|
Ti
|
1.0 × 1020 |
120
|
5.2 × 10-4 |
14
|
|
Ti
|
4.9 × 1020 |
17.0
|
7.3 × 10-4 |
15
|
|
Ti
|
3.2 × 1020 |
30.1
|
6.4 × 10-4 |
This study
|
Table 5.
The carrier density and optical band gap of TIO films as a function of electron irradiation
energy.
|
Electron energy (eV)
|
Carrier density (×1019 cm-3)
|
Optical band gap (eV)
|
|
As deposition
|
9.82
|
4.013
|
|
300
|
10.6
|
4.034
|
|
600
|
12.4
|
4.054
|
|
900
|
26.3
|
4.078
|
|
1200
|
30.5
|
4.086
|
|
1500
|
32.2
|
4.108
|