(Min Young Cho)
1
(Suman Timilsina)
2
(Jong Wook Roh)
2
(Walter Commerell)
3
(Ho Geun Shin)
4
(Yong-Nam Kwon)
5*
(Ji Sik Kim)
2*
Copyright © 2021 The Korean Institute of Metals and Materials
Key words(Korean)
smart fluid, photorheological fluid, phosphorescence, linearization, LSTM RNN
1. Introduction
Any fluid whose properties, such as viscosity, can be changed via certain stimuli
is known as a smart fluid [1-5]. Among a wide range of smart fluids, the most studied and utilized for real applications
are electro-rheological fluids (ERFs) and magneto-rheological fluids (MRFs) which
are today widely used in dampers [6,7], clutches [8,9], for polishing [10], brakes [11] and valves [12]. The ERFs viscosity can be altered by an applied electric field, while the MRFs
viscosity can be changed by an applied magnetic field. Unfortunately, ERFs and MRFs
are not single-phase solutions; consequently, particle deposition (phase splitting)
is inevitable, which is the major drawback of ERFs and MRFs. Also, the necessity of
high voltage for ERF and high current for MRF produces electro-magnetic interference
(EMI) and consequently EMI shielding is required, another challenge to deal with.
In recent years, a new type of smart fluid known as photo rheological fluids (PRFs)
have been considerably studied [13-23]. As the name suggests, light plays the active role in changing the rheological properties
of PRFs. This offers some advantages over the use of magnetic field and electric fields.
Since the viscosity of PRFs can be changed by light, it can be altered with precision
at a given location. The ability to precisely apply light on a given target is especially
essential in nano or microscale applications [24]. Moreover, unlike ERFs and MRFs, PRFs are nanoscale structured single-phase solutions,
and as a result there is no issue of phase splitting. Likewise, PRFs do not require
EMI shielding or any contact components such as electrodes and electric wires. These
advantages mean PRFs have great potential for use in sensors [25], microfluidics [26], microrobotics [27], lab-on-a-chip devices [28], drag-reducing fluids in recirculating systems for district heating and cooling
[29], and as patternable materials [30].
Different types of PRFs have been reported based on new, original types of photosensitive
organic molecules [15-29]. Most of them, including surfactants, polymers, salts, and gelators, are complex
photo responsive molecules and are not readily available. However, PRFs have been
developed based on simple, commercially available elements, which do not require complex
synthesis. For instance, Oh et al. developed surfactant-based PRFs from a commercially available component which demonstrated
a reversible many-fold rise in zero-shear viscosity under UV and visible light irradiation
[31]. The commercial availability of photo responsive materials saves considerable time
and effort that would otherwise be required to synthesize photo responsive molecules.
As a result, scientists in both academia and industry are increasingly oriented towards
inventing new applications based on commercially available photo responsive materials.
Irreversible PRFs have been also reported, but irreversibility is considered non-ideal
[32]. Lee et al. has reported reversible PRFs fabricated from commercially available materials (sodium
deoxycholate (SDC), lecithin, and spiropyran (SP)) where exposure to UV light increases
viscosity and exposure to visible light or heat energy reduces viscosity [33]. Cho et al. employed the same PRF as a non-contact tunable damper in a cantilever beam structure
[34]. Min et al. also used it and exploited its color-changing attributes under UV irradiation for
a colorimetric UV sensor device [25].
Despite its simpler structure, the commercial availability of essential ingredients
to facilitate its synthesis in the laboratory, its potential application in a wide
range of application, and reversibility, PRFs rate of change in viscosity under UV
on and off is not symmetric [26,34]. Instead, hysteresis behavior is typically observed. Linearization of the hysteresis
behavior is essential before PRF can be used in different types of sensors and actuators.
Understanding the hysteresis behavior and its linearization can be achieved either
by mathematical modeling or by artificial intelligence-based (AI) modeling. AI-based
hysteresis modeling and linearization is increasingly considered the best option to
describe complex hysteresis phenomenon, which otherwise would be a challenging task
using a mathematical model [35].
In this work, LSTM RNN-based real regression (RR) and linear regression (LR) methods,
which are types of AI-based methods, are employed to model the response of PRF fluids
under UV off/on conditions, and to linearize it, respectively. Artificial Intelligence-based
method are increasingly incorporated in almost every field to overcome the inherent
problems of materials [36,37]. This is the first attempt to use AI in the field of PRFs for simulation and linearization.
In section 2, the basic properties of PRFs are mentioned along with their synthesis
steps. The step that was taken to minimize the hysteresis effects of the PRF response
with the addition of phosphor SAO nanoparticles is described in section 3-1. Section
3-2 describes the LSTM RNN-based simulation and linearization methods.
2. Experiment Procedure
The PRF was prepared from the materials as originally described by Lee et al. [33]. First, 1.65 g of bile salt sodium deoxycholate (SDC) and 7.8 g of phospholipid
lecithin were mixed with 100 mL of non polar organic solvent cyclohexane. The solution
was homogeneously mixed bymagnetic stirring at 65 oC until a transparent solution
resulted. Thereafter, 0.48g of spiropyran (SP) was added into the transparent solution
and mixed by magnetic stirring at room temperature until the SP was perfectly mixed
into the solution. More detailed information on the preparation of the PR fluid sample
based on SP-doped reverse micelles from commercially available products is described
in the literature [33].
Before UV irradiation, lecithin interacts with SDC and forms a long worm-like structure
resulting in the formation of a transient network; this results in a high viscosity
fluid. Meanwhile, SP, which is hydrophobic and nonionic, remains in the fluid without
any interaction. As soon as the UV is turned on, SP converts into its photoisomer
known as merocyanine (MC). The formed MC is zwitter-ionic and hydrophilic in nature,
causing the interaction with the head groups of lecithin [33,38,39]. The SP and MC have different effects on the assembly of lecithin/SDC, leading to
the reversible light-induced changes in the viscosity of the solution. The transformation
toMC from SP is not only indicated by a decrease in viscosity but also by a change
in color, from yellow to red, as illustrated in Fig 1(a). The aforementioned changes in microstructure are illustrated in Fig 1(b), while the measured cyclic viscosity response under light off and on is depicted
in Fig 1(b). It can be clearly seen that the viscosity before the UV is turned on has a value
equal to 157 cP, while after the UV is on the viscosity decreased to 27 cP. This means,
for a given 160-sec exposure of UV light, the viscosity decreased 13 times. This range
of viscosity was determined experimentally using UV light.
The viscosity plateau determines the maximum viscosity of the PRF.A cyclic viscosity
response was determined considering the maximum and minimum viscosity value, as illustrated
in Fig 1(b). It should be noted that a constant UV source (1500 lux, INNO-CURE 200) and constant
room temperature (250C) were maintained throughout the experiment since the SP to
MC conversion depends on the intensity of the UV source as well as heat energy. The
rate of isomeric conversion from SP to MC and MC to SP were not equivalent. In fact,
the rate of SP to MC conversion exponentially decreased when the UV was on, while
the MC to SP increased non-linearly when UV was removed. The entire repeatable response
can be observed in Fig 1(c).The linearly proportional conversion rate produced a symmetric and linear PRF response
under UV off/on conditions, which is deemed a necessary property for the possible
application of PRFs in sensors or actuators.
3. Result and Discussion
3.1 Tuning the PRF rheological attributes with the addition of phosphor SAO nanoparticles
Cho et al. added the ZnS:Cu phosphor to the PRF fluid and found an almost symmetrical change
in viscosity occurred under UV off/on conditions. They attributed this to the effect
of green emission on the SP to MC conversion and viceversa [26]. In the present work, instead of ZnS:Cu, another class of long-lasting phosphor
known as SAO (SrAl2O4:Eu2+, Dy3+) was used to examine the performance of SAO for tailoring the rheological properties
of PRF. SAO has the same peak wavelength (520 nm) as ZnS:Cu, SAO has certain known
advantages over ZnS:Cu, such as lower density, much brighter phosphorescence, much
longer phosphorescence, higher humidity resistance, and high durability [40-42]. Experiments were conducted to determine whether SAO and PRF were complementary,
and whether it could be used instead of ZnS:Cu, given its certain benefits over ZnS:Cu.
A PRF containing SAO nanoparticles was prepared by mixing PRF and SAO at wt % 100:1
using a planetary mixer. The SAO dispersed in PRF is schematically illustrated in
Fig. 2(a). First, the full working range of the SAO and PRF composite was determined. The maximum
and minimum viscosity values were determined to be 120 cP and 60 cP, respectively.
Thereafter, its cyclic viscosity response was measured under UV off and on conditions,
as illustrated in Fig 2(b). Fig 2(b) shows that the PRF mixed with SAO phosphor exhibited an almost linear response during
the UV on and off conditions. This kind of response suggests that the PRF and SAO
composition is suitable for devices such as actuators and sensors. This further indicates
that the intrinsic alteration of kinetic conditions in the photonic transition between
SP and MC, as given in Equation (1), is linearized [26].
where u1 stands for a chemical isomerization from SP to MC under UV. The two back-isomerizations
from MC to SP is by u2 and u3 are attributed to visible chemical and thermal processes, respectively.
That is to say, the visible long green phosphorescence from the SAO particles could
have accelerated the visible-chemical recovery phenomenon (u2) from MC to SP after
removing the UV irradiation. At the same time, photons from the SAO could have decelerated
the SP to MC conversion during UV irradiation, thereby reducing the viscosity more
or less linearly. As a result, the simple addition of SAO, made it possible to linearize
the behavior of the photo-switchable fluid, like the use of ZnS:Cu.
However, the rate of change of viscosity in Fig 2(b) suggests that the conversion rate of SP to MC was double the rate of conversion from
MC to SP. In order to equalize the conversion rate, further studies will be conducted
in the near future considering the optimization of UV density and phosphor quantity.
It should also be noted that the maximum and minimum viscosity range shrank after
the incorporation of SAO. This can be attributed to the green emission during both
UV on and off, which affected the conversion of SP and MC. Interestingly, for a given
viscosity range, the response time was shortened by addition of SAO, as illustrated
in Fig.2, which is a very important feature for sensors and actuator.
In the repetitive cyclic test, the SAO particles were found to settle down. To overcome
this, further work considering phosphors with lower density and a porous morphology
needs to be performed, so that a colloid can be formed [43,44]. Forming a colloidal dispersion of the phosphor particles could ensure consistent
performance in sensors or actuators that exploit the photo-switchable rheological
properties of the compositionally adjusted PRFs.
3.2 LSTM RNN based simulation and linearization of the rheological response of PRF
Even though a complex mathematical model can be developed to describe the full response
of a PRF under On/Off, AI-based methods are better than mathematical modeling since
they can describe very complicated responses that might be impossible to develop mathematically
[45,46]. The direct model of PRF response was performed using Real Regression (RR). RR is
a program that learns training data obtained from real signal data and then predicts
the signal from the test data. The program consists of four different parts: preprocessing
the dataset, neural network modeling, learning, and testing and output. These steps
were performed using the libraries of numpy, keras, matplotlib, and pandas.
For neural network modeling, LSTM RNN was employed, and its structure is illustrated
in Fig 3(a).
It has 32 nodes with an input shape of (None, 1) and ReLU as an activation function.
The final output layer has one node and is built with a dense layer having a linear
activation function. Loss function uses L2 function (MSE) as a learning parameter
of the model. Out of four PRF cyclic responses under UV on/off, three curves were
used for training and the training was conducted 300 times by gradient descent. The
predicted PRF cyclic response, which is indistinguishable from the real PRF cyclic
response, is illustrated in Fig 3(b). In fact, the training accuracy and test accuracy were 98.7% and 98.3% respectively.
In this way, modeling of PRF cyclic response was easily performed considering the
AI-based modeling route without the need to develop a mathematical model considering
different parameters.
One of the most desirable properties in sensing device behavior is linearity with
no hysteresis. However, sensors involved in the measurement of physical variables
are often nonlinear with hysteresis behavior, and as a result they require some mechanism
for hysteresis compensation. Depending on the software approach, there are different
methods for this, including look-up tables, polygonal interpolation, polynomial approximation,
cubic spline interpolation, and artificial neural networks (ANNs) [47]. Each of these methods has unique features, which are reflected in the software
implementation, required processing resources, and the accuracy that can be achieved
by it.
For the past two decades, artificial neural network (ANN)-based techniques have been
employed in several applications, and they have shown some success in linearization
and hysteresis compensation [47-56]. In this work, linear regression (LR) was used for the hysteresis compensation of
the PRF response under the UV on/off condition. LR is a program that predicts linear
values after training experimentally obtained data, together with the labeling of
the data. Like RR,LR also consists of four different steps and was built using the
same libraries as was used for RR. The neural network was built using LSTM RNN as
shown in Fig 4(a) with 32 nodes with an input shape of (2,1) and ReLU as an activation function. The
final output layer has one node and was built with a dense layer having linear activation
function.
The loss function known as L2 function (MSE) was used as a learning parameter in the
model. First, using the data as shown in Fig 3(b), linear data was produced by iteratively constructing the lowest and highest points
of the data linearly and then linearly from the highest point to the lowest point.
After loading the non-linear PRF response and linear data, the labeling data for the
PRF response was produced. The total number of data shown in Fig 3(b) was split into 4 pieces: 0 ~ 346, 347 ~ 665, 666 ~ 992, and 993 ~ 1249, where 1249
was the total number of times.
The labeling operation code means the initial labeling of a signal is zero, and the
end-labeling consists of the ending number. For training, the first three cycles with
their labeling were used as input data and three linear cycles were constructed as
an output. Thereafter, for testing, all four of the cycles shown in Fig 3(b) along with their labeling were used as input, which resulted in a linearized output
as shown in Fig 4(b). The compensated PRF response using LSTM RNN and the original PRF response are compared
in Fig. 4(c), which shows good linearization except towards the bottom end. The differences seen
towards the bottom part is because the two lowest viscosities of the response curve
have slightly different values, as depicted in the hysteresis curve of the original
PRF response. The complex asymmetrical nonlinear response of PRF was effortlessly
simulated and linearized by employing the LSTM RNN-based neural network, without the
need to consider any of the material parameters, such as relaxation time constant.
Even though the incorporating the SAO in the PRF improved its linearity, a symmetrical
response was not obtained. Thus, it was interesting to employ the LSTM RNN-based neural
network to address the inherent drawback of the PRF characteristics. The outcomes
are very encouraging for the future employment of PRF as hardware in sensors and actuators.
4. Conclusion
The isomeric conversion from SP to MC and vice versa under UV off and on, respectively,
exhibited unequal rates of transformation, and as a result, a complex non-linear hysteretic
response was observed. To mitigate this problem, a well-known phosphor called SAO
was dispersed into the PRF, which resulted in a linear response with a shorter response
time. However, the PRF response was asymmetric under the UV off and on conditions.
To mitigate the unsymmetrical non-linear hysteretic response, a software approach
based on AI was employed. The PRF response was modeled using RR consisting of LSTM
RNN, and the PRF response was symmetrically linearized using an LR consisting of LSTM
RNN. The simulated PRF response was indistinguishably the same; moreover, the linearized
PRF response showed good hysteretic compensation. Therefore, with the aid of AI sensors
and actuators based on PRF can be realized despite the inherent hysteresis behavior
of the fluid.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded
by the Korean government (MPIS, MSIT) (No. 2015M3D1A1069719, 2021R1A2C1005732) and
Fundamental & Public Facility Building Research to Activate Industry Funding by Ministry
of Science and ICT (No. POC3330) and “Human Resources Program in Energy Technology”
of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP), granted
financial resource from the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea
(No. 20194010000040).
REFERENCES
Yoon C. M., Jang Y., Noh J., Kim J., Jang J., ACS nano,11, 9789 (2017)
Ren L., Sun S., Casillas-Garcis G., Nancarrow M., Peleckis G., Turdy M., Du K., Xu
X., Li W., Jiang L., Adv. Mater,30, 1802595 (2018)
Cao M., Jin X., Peng Y., Yu C., Li K., Liu K., Jiang L., Adv. Mater,29, 1606869 (2017)
Christianson C., Goldberg N. N., Deheyn D. D., Cai S., Tolley M. T., Sci. Robot,3,
eaat1893 (2018)
Kellaris N., Venkata V. G., Smith G. M., Mitchell S. K., Keplinger C., Sci. Robot,3,
eaar3276 (2018)
Chooi W. W., Oyadiji S. O., Comput. Struct,86, 473 (2008)
Rosenfeld N. C., Wereley N. M., Smart Mater. Struct,13, 1303 (2004)
Kesy Z., Kesy A., Jackson M. R., Parkin R. M., Int. Rev. Mech. Eng,2, 592 (2008)
Olszak A., Osowski K., Motyl P., Mędrek G., Zwolak J., Kęsy A., Kęsy Z., Choi S. B.,
Front. Mater,6, 139 (2019)
Genç S., P.Phulé P., Smart. Mater. Struct,11, 140 (2002)
Patel R., J. Magn. Magn. Mater,2011, 1360 (2011)
Sahin H., Gordaninejad F., Wang X., Liu Y., J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct,23, 949
(2012)
Dong Y. Z., Seo Y., Choi H. J., Soft Matter,15, 3473 (2019)
Ashtiani M., Hashemabadi S., Ghaffari A., J. Magn. Magn. Mater,374, 716 (2015)
Tu Y., Chen Q., Shang Y., Teng H., Liu H., Langmuir,35, 4634 (2019)
Tu Y., Ye Z., Lian C., Shang Y., Teng H., Liu H., Langmuir,34, 12990 (2018)
Oh H., Lu A. X., Javvaji V., DeVoe D. L., Raghavan S. R., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces,8,
17529 (2016)
Babu S. S., Praveen V. K., Ajayaghosh A., Chem. Rev,114, 1973 (2014)
Peng S., Guo Q., Hughes T. C., Hartley P. G., Langmuir,30, 866 (2014)
Abdollahi A., Roghani-Mamaqani H., Razavi B., Prog. Polym. Sci,98, 101149 (2019)
Zhang C., Liu Z., Liu H., Wang S., Zhang Y., Li C., Wu Y., Adv. Mater. Technol,4,
201900039 (2019)
Akamatsu M., Shiina M., Shrestha R. G., Sakai K., Abe M., Sakai H., RSC Adv,8, 23742
(2018)
Nam Y. S., Yoo I., Yarimaga O., Park I. S., Park D. H., Song S., Kim J. M., Lee C.
W., Chem. Comm,50, 4251 (2014)
Gatterdam V., Ramadass R., Stoess T., Fichte M. A., Wachtveitl J., Heckel A., Tampé
R., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed,53, 5680 (2014)
Min K. P., Kim G. W., Sensors,19, 1128 (2019)
Cho M. Y., Kim J. S., Choi H. J., Choi S. B., Kim G. W., Smart Mater. Struct,26, 054007
(2017)
Bates S. W., Massachusetts Institute of Technology,Ph. D Thesis,Cambridge (2010)
Sershen S. R., Mensing G. A., Ng M., Halas N. J., Beebe D. J., West J. L., Adv. Mater,17,
1366 (2005)
Matsumoto S., Yamaguchi S., Ueno S., Komatsu H., Ikeda M., Ishizuka K., Iko Y., Tabata
K. V., Aoki H., Ito S., Chem. Eur. J,14, 3977 (2008)
Shi H., Ge W., Oh H., Pattison S. M., Huggins J. T., Talmon Y., Hart D. J., Raghavan
S. R., Zakin J. L., Langmuir,29, 102 (2013)
Oh H., Ketner A. M., Heymann R., Kesselman E., Danino D., Falvey D. E., Raghavan S.
R., Soft Matter,9, 5025 (2013)
Ketner A. M., Kumar R., Davies T. S., Elder P. W., Raghavan S. R., J. Am. Chem. Soc,129,
1553 (2017)
Lee H. Y., Diehn K. K., Sun K., Che T., Raghavan S. R., J. Am. Chem. Soc,133, 8461
(2011)
Cho M. Y., Kim J. S., Choi S. B., Kim G. W., Smart Mater. Struct,25, 025022 (2016)
Cho M. Y., Lee J. H., Kim S. H., Kim J. S., Timilsina S., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces,11,
11910 (2019)
Jeong S. J., Hwang I. K., Cho I. S., Kim H. S., Korean J. Met. Mater,57, 184 (2019)
Kim B.-K., Goo N. H., Lee J. H., Han J. H., Korean J. Met. Mater,58, 822 (2020)
Wohl C. J., Helms M. A., Chung J. O., Kuciauskas D., J. Phys. Chem. B,110, 22796 (2006)
Tanaka M., Yonezawa Y., J. Phys. Chem,100, 5160 (1996)
Zhang J. C., Wang X., Marriott G., Xu C. N., Prog. Mater. Sci,103, 678 (2019)
Feng A., Smet P. F., Materials,11, 484 (2018)
Timilsina S., Kim J. S., Kim J., Kim G. W., Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf,17, 1237 (2016)
Huignard A., Gacoin T., Boilot J. P., Chem. Mater,12, 1090 (2000)
Alqahtani M. S., Hadia N., Mohamed S., Appl. Phys. A,124, 617 (2018)
Tomasevic N. M., Neskovic A. M., Neskovic N. J., Int. J. Neural Syst,22, 1250008 (2012)
Tomasevic N. M., Neskovic A. M., Neskovic N. J., Int. J. Neural Syst,27, 1750008 (2017)
Nenov T., Ivanov S., Sens. Mater,19, 95 (2017)
Lee B. D., Park W. B., Lee J. W., Kim M. S., Pyo M. H., Sohn K. S., Chem. Mater.,33,
782 (2021)
Lee J. W., Goo N. H., Park W. B., Pyo M. H., Sohn K. S., Eng. Rep.,3, (2021)
Islam T., Uddin Z., Gangopadhyay A., Sens. Transducers,191, 126 (2015)
Lee J. W., Park W. B., Lee B. D., Kim S. H., Goo N. H., Sohn K. S., Sci. Rep,10, 1
(2020)
Lee J. W., Park W. B., Lee J. H., Singh S. P., Sohn K. S., Nat. Commun,11, 1 (2020)
Medrano-Marques N. J., Martin-del-Brio B., IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron,48, 1288 (2001)
Park W. B., Chung J. Y., Jung J. Y., Sohn K. M., Singh S. P., Pyo M. H., Shin N. S.,
Sohn K. S., IUCrJ,4, 486 (2017)
Lee J. H., Singh S. P., Kim M. S., Pyo M. H., Park W. B., Sohn K. S., Inorg. Chem.
Front,6, 3493 (2019)
Park C. H., Cha D., Kim M., Reddy N. S., Yeom J.-T., Met. Mater. Int,25, 768 (2019)
Figures
Fig. 1.
Photoisomerism effect of SP on the rheological property of lecithin/SDC solution:
(a) color change of PRF under UV on/condition indicating transformation of SP to MC
and vice-versa (b) interaction of SP and MC with the headgroups of lecithin and illustration
of chemical structure of SP and MC, (c) variation on the viscosity of the PRF composed
of lecithin, SDC, and SP under UV on and off condition.
Fig. 2.
(a) Dispersed SAO particle in PRF and the effect of emitted photons from SAO on SP
to MC conversion and vice versa, (b) change in viscosity of the PRF composed SAO particle
under UV on and off condition, which improved the linearity as well as response time.
Fig. 3.
(a) Structure of LSTM RNN, (b) Illustration of real data obtained from the experiment
and predicted data from RR consisting of LSTM RNN.
Fig. 4.
(a) Structure of LSTM RNN, (b) Illustration of linearized PRF response using LR consisting
of LSTM RNN, (c) Comparison of hysteresis nature of PRF and compensated PRF response.