(Jin-Kyu Jang)
1
(Yun-Je Park)
2
(Yeon-Hak Lee)
1
(Jae-Wook Choi)
13
(Hyun-Jin Kim)
13
(Sung-Bo Heo)
3
(Young-Min Kong)
1
(Daeil Kim)
1*
Copyright © 2022 The Korean Institute of Metals and Materials
Key words(Korean)
ZnO, Au, XRD, AFM, Figure of merit
1. INTRODUCTION
Growing industrial demand for transparent and conductive metal oxide (TCO) films for
various display device applications has promoted the development of new TCO materials
and innovative TCO/metal/TCO tri-layered films [1] that can provide enhanced opto-electrical performance to conventional small amount
tin (Sn) doped In2O3 (ITO) thin films. Particularly for solar cell applications, many research works have
focused on molybdenum (Mo) doped zinc oxide (ZnO) [2] and gold (Au) doped ZnO [3] thin films because of their high visible transmittance and low electrical resistivity,
which can be comparable to conventional gallium (Ga) doped ZnO (GZO) films [4]. Also, it is well known that some metal doped ZnO films need high substrate treatment
temperatures of up to 300 °C to ensure the necessary electrical resistivity (2.7×10-3 Ωcm) and high visible transmittance (84.5%) [5]. However, that high substrate temperature is a major obstacle to the application
of metal doped ZnO films to broad flexible displays. Such high substrate temperatures
are not suitable for plastic substrates, due to their low melting temperature and
weak thermal shock properties.
Recently, Y. Park reported the opto-electrical properties of ZnO thin films with an
Au interlayer, and suggested the effective thickness of the Au interlayer was 8 nm
[6]. In this study, 8 nm thick Au interlayered ZnO (ZAZ) films were deposited on poly-imide
(PI) films with a radio frequency (13.56 MHz) and direct current magnetron sputtering
process. Then, the film surface was irradiated with intense electron beam to enhance
the opto-electrical performance of the films. The effect of electron irradiation on
the film’s property was investigated by observing the crystallization, surface roughness,
optical band gap and figure of merit, respectively.
2. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Tri-layered ZnO 50/Au 8/ZnO 50 nm films were deposited on transparent PI film (2×2
cm2) at room temperature. Prior to deposition, the chamber was evacuated to 6.5×10-7 Torr and then high purity argon (Ar) gases were injected to an ideal deposition condition
of 1×10-3 Torr. Table 1(a) and (b) shows the experimental deposition and electron beam irradiation [7] conditions of this study. After deposition, an electrical power of 250 W was biased
on the RF (13.56 MHz) coil antenna of the electron irradiation source and the electron
irradiation energy was varied from 300 to 900 eV. The film thickness was confirmed
with a surface profilometer (Dektak 150, Veeco), and thin film crystallinity was analyzed
using high resolution X-ray diffraction (HR-XRD) at the KBSI, Daegu Center.
In addition, the cross section image, chemical component, visible transmittance and
sheet resistance were measured with a scanning electron microscope (SEM), an energy
dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS), a UV-Visible spectrometer and a four-point probe
system. The bare PI substrates had a visible transmittance of 91%. The surface morphology
and root mean square (RMS) roughness of the films were observed with an atomic force
microscope (AFM).
To evaluate the influence of electron irradiation on the opto-electrical performance
of the films, the figure of merits were compared. To investigate the flexibility of
the ZAZ films electron irradiated at optimal incident energy, bending tests were also
performed under various bending radius conditions. To compare the flexibility of the
ZAZ film, 100 nm thick ITO films were deposited on PI films with the same ZnO sputtering
conditions.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Fig 1(a) and (b) show a cross-section image of the ZAZ film, and the results of component analysis
(SEM-EDS). The XRD patterns of the ZAZ films electron irradiated at different electron
energy conditions are shown in Fig 2. Recently, P. H. Xiang et al. investigated the crystallization mode of ITO films deposited on mica substrate over
a substrate temperature range of 100-500 °C [8]. They reported that the ITO film formed an amorphous phase at substrate temperatures
below 200 °C. However, all of the ZAZ films in Fig 2 show diffraction peaks for ZnO (002) and Au (111) regardless of electron irradiation
energy.
Fig 3(a) and (b) show the full width at half maximum (FWHM) and average grain size measured by the
Scherrer formula. While the as deposited films show a grain size of 11.53 nm (ZnO
(002)), the films electron irradiated at 900 eV show a larger grain size of 14.32
nm, respectively.
Fig 4 shows the visible transmittance of the ZAZ films. The as deposited films show a high
visible transmittance of 79.0%. Although the as deposited and electron irradiated
films did not show a big difference in visible transmittance, the films electron irradiated
at 900 eV show a higher optical transmittance of 79.8%. It is well known that the
optical transmittance of TCO film depends upon crystallization, because grain boundaries
can scatter visible light and result in low visible transmittance [9]. From Fig 1, the little enhancement in visible transmittance produced by electron irradiation
is attributed to an increase in the grain of ZnO and Au in the films.
Table 2 shows the figure of merit (FOM) as a function of electron irradiation energy. The
FOM is a criterion for measuring the opto-electrical performance of transparent electrode
applications [10]. The FOM is defined as
where T is the visible transmittance and R sh is the sheet resistance. With increasing electron
irradiation energy (~900 eV), the FOM was enhanced to 1.86×10-3 Ω-1.
Fig 5 shows AFM images of the ZAZ films. The electron irradiated films exhibit a flatter
surface than the as deposited films that were not electron irradiated. Surface roughness
is a critical factor for all opto-electronic applications of TCO films, because the
rough surface allows more optical scattering than a flat surface, and electrical conductivity
is also degraded by reduced carrier mobility due to the rough surface. In Fig 3, the higher visible transmittance observed for the films electron irradiated at 900
eV is attributed to their having a flatter surface than the other films. This suggests
that electron irradiation is a useful method for forming a flat surface on ZAZ films,
resulting in higher visible transmittance.
Table 3 shows the dependence of electrical properties and optical band gap energy on the
electron irradiation energy. The carrier density, mobility and optical band gap energy
were enhanced by the increase in electron irradiation energy. The decrease in resistivity
(6.1×10-4 Ωcm) with the increase in electron irradiation energy up to 900 eV is thought to
be due to an enlarged grain size, as shown in Table 1, and the flat surface observed in AFM images.
Fig 6 shows a plot of (αhν)2 of the ZAZ films as a function of the photon energy (hν). The optical band gap energy
(Eg) is estimated by extrapolation of the linear part on the hν axis. The absorption
coefficient (α) is evaluated using Eq. (2) [11]:
where t is the thickness and T is the visible transmittance. The Tauc formula in Eq. (3) shows the relationship
between the absorption coefficient (α) and optical band gap (Eg) [12]:
where A is the absorption edge width parameter. From the observed electrical properties
and optical band gap energy, it is supposed that the band gap movement is related
to the carrier concentration. The band gap was enhanced, from 4.03 to 4.07 eV, as
the carrier concentration increased from 2.7 ×1021 (at deposition) to 3.0×1021 cm-3 (at 900 eV).
Fig 7 shows the results of the bending test of the ZAZ films electron beam irradiated at
900 eV, and as deposited ITO films (sheet resistance: 250 Ω/□).While the ZAZ films
did not exhibit any increase in sheet resistance until the bending radius reached
2 mm, the sheet resistance of the ITO films increased starting at bending radius of
9 mm. Since the ZAZ films did not show any change in sheet resistance after 10,000
trials of the bending test at 2 mm bending radius, it is concluded that electron irradiated
ZAZ films have better flexibility than conventional ITO films.
4. CONCLUSIONS
Thin Au interlayered ZnO films were deposited by DC and RF magnetron sputtering on
PI substrates, and then the effects of post-deposition electron irradiation on the
optical and electrical properties were investigated. The opto-electrical performance
was enhanced by electron irradiation at 900 eV, from 1.29×10-3 to 1.86×10-3 Ω-1. From the experimental results, it is concluded that electron irradiation is an effective
surface treatment technology for improving the optical and electrical performance,
and the flexibility of ZAZ films without substrate deformation.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the 2022 Research Fund of University of Ulsan.
REFERENCES
Kim Y. S., Choi J. Y., Park Y. J., Choe S. H., Cha B. C., Kong Y. M., Kim D., Korean
J. Met. Mater,58, 190 (2020)

Tirumalareddygaria S. R., Guddetib P. R., Reddy K.T. R., Appl. Surf. Sci,458, 333
(2018)

Gogurla N., Bayan S., Chakrabarty P., Ray S. K., J. Lumin,194, 15 (2018)

Bhosle V., Tiwari A., Narayan J., J. Appl. Phys,100, 033713 (2006)

Kim S. K., Kim S. H., Kim S. Y., Jeon J. H., Gong T. K., Choi D. H., Son D. I., Kim
D., Ceram. Int,40, 6673 (2014)

Park Y. J., Choe S. H., Kim Y. S., Cha B. C., Gong Y. M., Kim D., J. Korean Inst.
Surf. Eng,53, 104 (2020)

Sharma S. K., Biswas K., Majumdar J. D., Met. Mater. Int,27, 5360 (2021)

Bao S. Y., Deng X., MaO F., Zhong N., Yue F. Y., Sun L., Xiang P. H., Duan G., Ceram.
Int,46, 2268 (2020)

Cui H. N., Teixeira V., Meng L. J., Martins R., Vacuum,82, 1507 (2008)

Park J. H., Chae J. H., Kim D., J. Alloys Compd,478, 330 (2009)

Peng S., Yao T., Yang Y., Zhang K., Jiang J., Jin K., Li G., Cao X., Xu G., Wang Y.,
Physica B,503, 111 (2016)

Tauc J., Amorphous and Liquid Semiconductors,Plenum (1974)

Figures and Tables
Fig. 1.
The cross-section image of ZAZ film (a) and the result of component analysis (b).
Fig. 2.
XRD patterns of ZnO 50 /Au 8 /ZnO 50 nm films electron irradiated at different energies.
Fig. 3.
Average grain size and full width at half maximum of the ZnO (002) (a) and Au (111)
(b) as a function of electron irradiation
energies.
Fig. 4.
The visible transmittance of ZAZ films electron irradiated at different energies.
Fig. 5.
Surface AFM images and RMS roughness of ZAZ films electron irradiated at different
energies. (a) As deposition: 1.5 nm, (b) 300 eV: 1.4 nm, (c) 600 eV: 1.3 nm, (d) 900
eV: 1.1 nm.
Fig. 6.
Optical band gap energy of ZAZ films as a function of electron irradiation energy.
Fig. 7.
Compared sheet resistance change of electron irradiated ZAZ and as deposited ITO films
as a function of bending radius.
Table 1(a).
Experimental deposition conditions of ZnO and Au thin film.
|
Base pressure (Torr)
|
6.5×10-7 |
|
Deposition pressure (Torr)
|
1.0×10-3 |
|
DC sputtering power density (W/cm²)
|
Au, 3.3
|
|
RF sputtering power density (W/cm²)
|
ZnO, 3.5
|
|
Ar gas flow rate (sccm)
|
10
|
|
Deposition rate (nm/min)
|
ZnO : 10, Au : 50
|
|
Film thickness (nm)
|
ZnO : 50, Au 8
|
Table 1(b).
Post-deposition electron irradiation conditions.
|
Base pressure (Torr)
|
6.5×10-7 |
|
Working pressure (Torr)
|
5.0×10-5 |
|
Irradiation time (min)
|
10
|
|
RF Power (W)
|
250
|
|
Ar gas flow rate (sccm)
|
3
|
|
Irradiation energy (eV)
|
300, 600, 900
|
Table 2.
Effect of electron irradiation on the figure of merit of ZAZ films.
|
ZAZ film
|
Sheet resistance (Ω/□)
|
Visible Transmittance (%)
|
Figure of merit (×10-3 Ω-1)
|
|
As deposition
|
73.3
|
79.0
|
1.29
|
|
300 eV
|
63.5
|
79.3
|
1.54
|
|
600 eV
|
59.3
|
79.5
|
1.69
|
|
900 eV
|
56.0
|
79.8
|
1.86
|
Table 3.
Effect of electron irradiation on the electrical properties and optical band gap energy
of ZAZ films.
|
ZAZ film
|
Carrier density (×1021 cm-3)
|
Carrier mobility (cm2 V-1s-1)
|
Electrical resistivity (×10-4 Ωcm)
|
Optical band gap [eV]
|
|
As deposition
|
2.7
|
2.8
|
8.0
|
4.03
|
|
300 eV
|
2.8
|
3.1
|
7.0
|
4.05
|
|
600 eV
|
2.9
|
3.2
|
6.5
|
4.06
|
|
900 eV
|
3.0
|
3.4
|
6.1
|
4.07
|