(Jun Gi Seo)
1
(Jae Min Song)
1
(Do Yeon Lee)
1
(Tae Jun Park)
2*
(Han Jung Kwon)
1*
Copyright © 2024 The Korean Institute of Metals and Materials
Key words(Korean)
Iron Ore, Assimilation, Penetration Depth, Sintered Ore, Reactivity Index
1. INTRODUCTION
Iron ore sinters are the main source of iron for the current blast furnace ironmaking
process in Asia. A characteristic of blast furnace operation in Asia is that the cost
of using sintered ore is high among charged raw materials, so the quality of sintered
ore is a key factor for stable blast furnace operation. Fig 1 schematically shows the sintering process of iron ore. The sintering of iron ore
involves the blending of iron ore with additives in appropriate proportions to form
aggregates, based on the composition of the sintered ore that is required in the blast
furnace. The general properties of sintered ore mainly include reducibility, mechanical
strength, and reduction degradation, which are most affected by the composition and
structure of the bonding phase during heating and cooling in the sintering process
[1-10]. Accordingly, attempts to improve the quality of sintered ore must be based on an
understanding of the mineralogical properties of the raw materials, especially iron
ore. During the sintering process, a bonding area formed by melting due to the reaction
between the iron ore and additives has a significant impact on the yield and strength
of the sintered ore [11-13].
A recent study by Higuchi et al. [11] reported that melt formation proceeds via different paths depending on the particle
size in the iron ore. At the beginning of heating, the fine-grained ore reacts with
CaO in the additives and melts to form a bonding area, after which the coarse-grained
ore partially reacts with the melt to form the connecting structure in the final product.
Wu et al. [14-15] proposed the concept of “melt absorption properties” to estimate the degree of reaction
between the primary melt and ore and found that high melt absorption properties had
a negative effect on bond strength. The bond strength of the sintered ore is not only
related to the self-fluidity of the primary liquid phase, but also to the degree of
assimilation between the primary liquid phase and ore particles. Park et al. [16-17] reported that the assimilation characteristics of the bonding area of the sintered
ore deteriorate with increasing Al2O3 content in the iron ore. A sinter POT test revealed that the poorer the assimilation
characteristics of the blending, the smaller the productivity and particle size of
the sintered ore.
However, previous studies that only analyzed the effect of composition, without considering
the particle size of the iron ore in the sintered ore manufacturing process, have
limitations, and it is essential to comprehensively study the influence of particle
size and composition on the sintered ore manufacturing process. Therefore, this study
attempted to complement the limitations of previous studies by considering the influence
of not only composition but also particle size during the manufacturing of sintered
ore. Ultimately, this study provides basic data for particle size control in the manufacturing
of sintered ore.
2. EXPERIMENTAL
2.1 Preparation of raw materials
Generally, the design of the blending process for sintered ore is based on the representative
chemical composition. Table 1 shows the results of analyzing the chemical composition and composition variation
according to the particle size of the Pisolite series iron ore of Australian company
B, which was used in this study. Even within the same iron ore brand, the contents
of the chemical components differed depending on the particle size. In particular,
differences in chemical composition were observed in iron ores smaller than 1 mm.
Additionally, the Al2O3 content increased relatively with decreasing particle size. It is believed that the
alumina content is higher on the smaller grain sizes due to a higher clay content.
In this study, iron ore with particle sizes of less than 1 mm was used as the attached
particles in the process of granulating fine iron ore and additive materials in the
sintering process [11,18-19]. To evaluate the assimilation properties of the iron ore, the calcium ferrite that
was reacted with the iron ore contained 26 wt% CaO and 74 wt% Fe2O3 [15,17]. The calcium ferrite was prepared using reagent grade Fe2O3 (Sigma–Aldrich, ≥99.9%) and CaCO3 (Thermo Fisher, 99.5%). CaCO3 powder was calcined at 1173 K for 8 h to obtain CaO, after which the CaO was mixed
with Fe2O3 to prepare the calcium ferrite. The fully mixed calcium ferrite powder was homogenized
by pre-melting in a muffle furnace at 1773 K for 12 h in an Ar (99.99 vol%, 5 slm)
atmosphere. The treatment time of 12 h was considered sufficient for homogenization
because previous works have shown that that the molten calcium ferrite attains an
equilibrium state when the holding time is more than 2 h [17,20-21].
2.2 Reaction experiment for assimilation between iron ore and calcium ferrite
Fig 2 shows a schematic of the experimental procedure. Ore fines were pressed into cylindrical
tablets with diameters of 10 mm and heights of 5 mm. To understand the assimilation
between the iron ore and calcium ferrite during sintering, a pre-melted CaO and Fe2O3 composite to produce calcium ferrite (CaFe2O4) was also shaped into a cylindrical tablet with a length of 8 mm and height of
3 mm and placed on top of the ore tablet. The iron ore reaction depth was determined
by measuring the calcium ferrite/ore reaction zone 10 times to derive the mean value
(Fig 2(a)). The heat treatment was carried out in an Ar atmosphere. The temperature was increased
at a rate of 10 °C/min and the temperature was maintained at 723 and 1553 K for 30
min, as shown in Fig 2(b). After the heat treatment, the samples were allowed to cool naturally and polished
for microstructural observation of the bonding zones between the iron ore and minor
elements. Microstructure and composition were analyzed using optical microscopy, field
emission scanning electron microscopy, and field electron probe microanalysis (FE-EPMA,
JXA-iHP200F, JEOL). The thermodynamic calculation program FactSage 8.3 was used to
calculate the temperature of the emerging liquid melt phase resulting from the reaction
between the iron ore and additive materials.
3. RESULTS AND DISSCUSSION
3.1 Assimilation characteristics according to the Al2O3 content of iron ore
Fig 3 shows the cross-sectional microstructure after the reaction with calcium ferrite,
for each iron ore particle size. The assimilation characteristics of the iron ore
and calcium ferrite could be distinguished by the difference in image contrast under
an optical microscope. To quantify and compare the assimilation characteristics in
detail, the previously developed Iron ore Reaction Index (IRI; Fig 4) was used to measure the assimilation characteristics [17]. The assimilation area of the calcium ferrite was measured at the interface reference,
indicated by a red straight line along the cross-sectional microstructure. The IRI
indicates the tendency of the initial melt and iron ore to react with each other and
provides an index of the melt penetration depth. The IRI was calculated using equation
(1):
The value of this index is 5 when the iron ore and the initial melt are fully penetrated
and reacted, and 0 when the iron ore and the initial melt do not penetrate and react.
If at least one point is fully penetrated, the IRI is considered to be 5. In this
study, the reaction area varied depending on the sample size and reaction time. Thus,
the IRI was used for accurate comparison with previous results [18,22-23].
When the iron ore particle size was 1–0.5 mm, the IRI was 2.23, indicating that ~45%
of the iron ore tablets reacted with the calcium ferrite. As the particle size of
the iron ore decreased, the IRI decreased, and at a particle size of 0.15 mm or less,
the value was 0.46, indicating little assimilation with calcium ferrite. This generally
runs counter to the theory that the smaller the particle size, the greater the reactivity
due to the wider reaction surface area. To interpret this phenomenon, the correlation
between the chemical components and IRI was investigated.
Fig 5 shows the correlation between the Al2O3 content in the iron ore and the IRI. It is evident that the IRI decreases with increasing
Al2O3 content in iron ore because of the increase in viscosity as well as the decreased
ore particle size, and this trend is the same as that observed in previous studies
[11,17-19].
This phenomenon can be explained according to the change in the melt formation behavior
as a function of Al2O3 in the melt. During melt formation, the Al2O3 acts as a melt inhibitor and decreases the melt surface tension. Fig 6 shows IRI the phase diagram of the Fe2O3–CaO–Al2O3 ternary system derived using the FactSage thermodynamics program; the liquidus line
can be confirmed from the phase diagram. In the Fe2O3–CaO–Al2O3 ternary system, the temperature at which the liquid phase appears changes depending
on the composition, and the temperature at which the liquid phase appears increases
as the Al2O3 content increases. As a result, the amount of liquid phase at 1553 K decreases, and
the amount of the solid phase increases depending on the Al2O3 content (Fig 7).
Therefore, when the iron ore is a fine particle, the observed decrease in reactivity
with additives can be attributed to a higher liquid phase appearance temperature,
which is caused by increased Al2O3 content, coupled with a reduced bonding area stemming from a smaller amount of liquid
phase. Therefore, it can be inferred that the assimilation characteristics of iron
ore and calcium ferrite are more dependent on the Al2O3 content within the iron ore rather than on the enlarged reaction surface area resulting
from reduced particle size.
3.2 Effect of particle size and Al2O3 content of iron ore on assimilation characteristics
To investigate the effects of particle size and Al2O3 content on the assimilation properties of the iron ore, the chemical composition
of the iron ore was fixed by blending iron ores with different particle sizes. The
designed blends are presented in Table 2, and the chemical compositions of the blends are presented in Table 3. To minimize the influence of the chemical components, the design goal was to achieve
a uniform chemical composition across the samples, with an increased ratio of iron
ore of 0.15 mm or smaller, which had the highest Al2O3 content.
Fig 8 displays the cross-sectional microstructures for each blending case post-assimilation.
Case 1 exhibited the most significant assimilation among the blends, with the degree
of assimilation of iron ore and calcium ferrite being similar in Cases 2–5. Consequently,
Case 1 exhibited the highest IRI at 2.82, while Cases 2–5 showed comparable levels
of around 1. In Case 1’s blend, the Al2O3 content was 2.33, higher than the IRI in the 1-0.5 mm particle size sample, with
2.11 wt. % Al2O3, as mentioned in Section 3.1. However, in Cases 2–5, despite an increase in the ratio
of iron ore with high Al2O3 content (0.15 mm or smaller) and low Al2O3 content (1 to 0.5 mm), the IRI remained low (roughly 1) due to the increased ratio
of iron ore with high Al2O3 content. This confirms the effect of blended iron ore particle size on assimilation
and provides a guide to the use range of -0.15 mm particle size, even with similar
Al2O3 content. As more care is taken to match the average chemical composition of the iron
ore, a situation may arise in which the content of fines increases. Therefore, this
research result means that even if the average particle size and the chemical composition
of the iron ore satisfy the specifications, the Al2O3 content range of -0.15mm should be considered.Fig. 9.
Fig 10 presents the SEM images of Cases 1 and 5, and the EPMA mapping results for the cross-sectional
microstructures at the top, middle, and bottom of the reaction zone. As shown in Fig 10(a), a broad reaction area between the calcium ferrite and iron ore was observed in Case
1, indicating complete assimilation of calcium ferrite with iron ore. EPMA mapping
revealed an even distribution of the Al component across the reaction area, which
directly affects the assimilation of iron ore. In contrast, Al was concentrated in
the top layer of the sample. This suggests that assimilation occurs when the flow
of the calcium ferrite liquid phase and the movement of ore particles happen concurrently,
promoting assimilation and leading to a smoothly formed melt with an expanded melting
area. Conversely, Fig 10(b) shows there was limited assimilation in Case 5, where the Al component is present
only in the iron ore portion (Fig 11(b)-(c)) and in some assimilated areas (Fig 10(b)-(b)). In the calcium ferrite area, only Fe and Ca components were observed, indicating
that assimilation with the iron ore was not achieved in this case.
A schematic of the reaction is shown in Fig 11 to explain this phenomenon. As the temperature increases, iron ore with a low aluminum
content of 0.25 to 0.15 mm is preferentially melted to produce a liquid phase. This
process is facilitated by the latent heat produced as the melt volume grows. Notably,
it is hypothesized that iron ore particles smaller than 0.15 mm, which possess a relatively
high Al2O3 content, will melt more readily due to this latent heat (Fig 11(a)). Conversely, when the proportion of iron ore with a lower Al2O3 content (particle sizes between 0.25 to 0.15 mm) is reduced in favor of iron ore
with particle sizes less than 0.15 mm, the initial melting temperature tends to be
higher. This observation holds even when the proportion of iron ore with the largest
particle size (1 to 0.5 mm) and the lowest Al2O3 content among the mix increases. In such cases, the reaction tends to be slower due
to the smaller reaction surface area, attributed to the larger particle size (Fig 11(b)). Consequently, differences in the assimilation characteristics of calcium ferrite
and iron ore can arise for the same reaction time.
In conclusion, the findings of this study underscore the significant impact of chemical
composition on the assimilation process. However, the influence of particle size distribution
is also non-negligible. Ultimately, it becomes evident that both the composition and
particle size distribution must be carefully considered when determining the blending
ratio of iron ore. This is crucial to ensure the strength of the sintered ore.Top
of Form
4. CONCLUSIONS
In this study, we explored the effects of composition and the particle size of the
iron ore on its assimilation behavior during the sintering process with calcium ferrite.
This investigation offers a comprehensive understanding of the influence of both composition
and particle size on the assimilation process in iron ore and calcium ferrite.
1) During the iron ore sintering process, we observed variations in chemical composition
among iron ore particles smaller than 1 mm, categorized as attached particles. Notably,
the differences in Al2O3 content were the most pronounced.
2) The penetration depth decreased due to higher melt formation temperature and lower
melt volume according to increased Al2O3 content.
3) We found that as the particle size of the iron ore decreased, the Al2O3 content increased. Consequently, the assimilation properties were also influenced
by the Al2O3 content in the melt. This content is determined by the reaction between the iron
ore and the initial melt.
4) Our findings indicate that even when the Al2O3 content and reaction time are held constant, the assimilation characteristics differ
based on the particle size composition of the iron ore.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Basic Research Project (24-3212-2) of the Korea
Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM) funded by the Ministry of Science,
ICT, and Future Planning of Korea and a grant from the Korea Institute of Energy Technology
Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) funded by the Korean government (MOTIE) (20228A10100030).
REFERENCES
Zhang G. L., Wu S. L., Chen S .G., ISIJ Int,53, 1515 (2013)

Yin J., Lv X., Xiang S., Bai C., Yu B., ISIJ Int,53, 1571 (2013)

Park T. J., Choi J. S., Min D. J., Mater. Trans. B,50, 790 (2019)

Park T. J., Choi J. S., Min D. J., Steel Res. Int,90, 1900001 (2019)

Webster N. A. S., Pownceby M. I., Madsen I. C., Kimpton J. A., Metall. Mater. Trans.
B,43, 1344 (2012)

Webster N. A. S., Pownceby M. I., Madsen I. C., Studer A. J., Manuel J. R., Kimpton
J., Metall. Mater. Trans. B,45, 2097 (2014)

Pownceby M. I., Hapugoda S., Manuel S., Webster N. A. S., MacRae C. M., Miner. Eng,413,
106022 (2019)

Park T. J., Choi J. S., Min D. J., Met. Mater. Int,26, 532 (2020)

Kwon H., Shin J.-M., Korean J. Met. Mater,60, 53 (2022)

Lee E. S., Heo Y. J., Kim J. Y., Lee Y.-I., Suk M.-J., Oh S.-T., Korean J. Met. Mater,61,
170 (2023)

Higuchi K., Okazaki J., Nomura S., ISIJ Int,60, 674 (2020)

Zhai X., Wu S., Zhou H., Su L., Ma X., Ironmak. Steelmak,47, 405 (2020)

Jeon J. W., Kim S. W., Jung S. M., ISIJ Int,55, 513 (2015)

Wu S. L., Zhang G. L., Steel Res. Int,86, 1014 (2015)

Wu S. L, Qi Y. H., Ku M. Y., Li Y., Zhang W. L., Metall. Mater. Trans. B,48, 2469
(2017)

Park T. J., Choi J. S., Min D. J., Met. Mater. Int,28, 2033 (2022)

Park T. J., Choi J. S., Min D. J., Steel Res. Int,92, 2100206 (2021)

Okazaki J., Higuchi K., Hosotani Y., Shinagawa K., ISIJ Int,43, 1384 (2003)

Zhai X. B., Wu S. L., Zhou H., Su L., Ma X. D., Ironmak. Steelmak,47, 405 (2020)

Wang Z., Sun Y., Sridhar S., Zhang M., Zhang Z., Metall. Mater. Trans. B,48, 527 (2017)

Wang Z., Sun Y., Sridhar S., Zhang M., Guo M., Zhang Z., Metall. Mater. Trans. B,46,
2246 (2015)

Zhiyun J., Yixiong Z., Min G., Xiaohui F., Xuling C., Xiaoxian H., J. Mater. Res.
Technol,9, 14443 (2020)

Loo C. E., Leung W., ISIJ Int,43, 1393 (2003)

Figures and Tables
Fig. 1.
Schematic of the iron ore sintering process
Fig. 2.
Experimental schematics and conditions. (a) A couple of tablets simulating and measuring
positions of melt penetration depth and (b) experimental temperature and atmosphere
Fig. 3.
Macrostructure of the vertical cross section according to particle size after the
assimilation characteristic tests: (a) 1–0.5 mm, (b) 0.5–0.25 mm, (c) 0.25–0.15 mm,
and (d) <0.15 mm
Fig. 4.
IRI according to iron ore size
Fig. 5.
Relationship between the IRI and Al2O3 content in the iron ore
Fig. 6.
Ternary phase diagram of the Fe2O3-CaO-Al2O3 system illustrating liquidus lines
Fig. 7.
Variation in solid and liquid phase ratios as a function of the Al2O3 content
Fig. 8.
Macrostructure of the vertical cross section post-assimilation tests for various blending
cases: (a) Case 1, (b) Case 2, (c) Case 3, (d) Case 4, (e) Case 5
Fig. 9.
IRI according to blending cases
Fig. 10.
EPMA analysis of samples post-reaction for different blending cases: (a) Case 1, (b)
Case 2
Fig. 11.
Schematic illustrating the assimilation mechanism across different particle sizes:
(a) Large assimilation and (b) small assimilation
Table 1.
Chemical composition and composition variation according to the particle size
|
Ore type
|
Chemical composition (wt%)
|
|
T.Fe
|
FeO
|
SiO2 |
Al2O3 |
MgO
|
LOI
|
|
Pisolite
|
58.79
|
0.15
|
5.91
|
1.79
|
0.08
|
9.77
|
|
Particle Size (mm) |
Chemical composition (wt%)
|
|
T.Fe |
SiO2 |
Al2O3 |
MgO |
TiO2 |
P2O5 |
|
> 8 mm
|
59.94
|
5.43
|
1.05
|
0.06
|
0.05
|
0.06
|
|
8–5 mm
|
59.96
|
5.38
|
1.05
|
0.06
|
0.04
|
0.09
|
|
5–3 mm
|
58.85
|
7.49
|
1.22
|
0.07
|
0.05
|
0.09
|
|
3–1 mm
|
59.09
|
5.96
|
1.79
|
0.09
|
0.09
|
0.09
|
|
1–0.5 mm
|
58.72
|
5.87
|
2.11
|
0.10
|
0.11
|
0.10
|
|
0.5–0.25 mm
|
58.37
|
5.94
|
2.33
|
0.11
|
0.12
|
0.10
|
|
0.25–0.15 mm
|
58.20
|
5.99
|
2.40
|
0.11
|
0.12
|
0.10
|
|
< −0.15
|
57.85
|
6.29
|
2.61
|
0.12
|
0.14
|
0.10
|
Table 2.
Size distribution of iron ore blending ratio
|
Iron ores
|
Iron ore blending ratio (%)
|
|
Case 1
|
Case 2
|
Case 3
|
Case 4
|
Case 5
|
|
1–0.5 mm
|
25
|
30
|
33
|
38
|
40
|
|
0.5–0.25 mm
|
20
|
20
|
17
|
12
|
20
|
|
0.25–0.15 mm
|
45
|
35
|
30
|
25
|
10
|
|
< −0.15 mm
|
10
|
15
|
20
|
25
|
30
|
Table 3.
Chemical composition of iron ore blends
|
|
Case 1
|
Case 2
|
Case 3
|
Case 4
|
Case 5
|
|
T.Fe
|
58.33
|
58.34
|
58.33
|
58.33
|
58.34
|
|
SiO2 |
5.98
|
5.99
|
6.00
|
6.01
|
6.02
|
|
Al2O3 |
2.33
|
2.33
|
2.33
|
2.33
|
2.33
|
|
CaO
|
0.08
|
0.09
|
0.09
|
0.10
|
0.10
|
|
MgO
|
0.11
|
0.11
|
0.11
|
0.11
|
0.11
|